Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7620

Bill Overview

Title: Stop Sexual Harassment in K–12 Act

Description: This bill outlines the role and duties of Title IX coordinators in elementary and secondary schools, including by requiring local educational agencies to increase the number of full-time employees designated to serve as a Title IX coordinator per specified student population. The bill also creates a grant program to train teachers and staff on how to respond to signs of sexual harassment and assault of students and requires the Department of Education to develop a sexual violence climate survey.

Sponsors: Rep. Casten, Sean [D-IL-6]

Target Audience

Population: K-12 students, teachers, staff, and parents worldwide

Estimated Size: 70000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Teacher (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could be a game changer as it mandates more comprehensive training, something we desperately need.
  • Increasing Title IX coordinators means more dedicated people to handle sensitive issues promptly, rather than relying on overwhelmed teachers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Parent of a middle school child (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a parent, knowing that the school will have more resources and trained staff is reassuring.
  • My child's safety and well-being is paramount, and this policy helps address that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Administrative staff at a public school (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our school often lacked clear procedures; this policy could standardize how we handle harassment.
  • More coordinators mean better attention and time for incidents that arise.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

School Principal (Dallas, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this policy positively impacting our operation, but we must ensure training is practical.
  • It can also help reduce liability issues by equipping our staff with necessary skills and protocols.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

High School Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 16 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm relieved there might be someone focused on helping us, a known face to go to.
  • It feels like steps are being taken to make schools safer for people like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 6 4

Title IX Coordinator (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This gives me a more defined role and scope to implement positive changes.
  • Finally, we have a budget and framework to support our students effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

School District Administrator (Rural Georgia)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Budget is always a concern, but this directive provides federal support for vital issues.
  • We will have to adapt this for rural schools, but the intention is sound.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Middle School Counselor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The additional coordinators will help alleviate the burden on counselors.
  • I hope this means more thorough training across the staff.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

College Student studying education (Boston, MA)

Age: 20 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It seems like a move in the right direction for safer schools.
  • Hopefully, this approach can shift the culture around harassment even before students reach college.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Stay-at-home parent (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome any change that ensures my children feel safe at school.
  • I am curious about the implementation and how soon we'll see changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 3: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 10: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 100: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Key Considerations