Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7610

Bill Overview

Title: 21st Century Dyslexia Act

Description: This bill addresses the education of children with disabilities, with a particular focus on children with dyslexia. Currently, dyslexia is listed as one of the disabilities under the definition of specific learning disability in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This bill instead removes dyslexia from the definition of specific learning disability and establishes a stand-alone definition for dyslexia within IDEA. Specifically, the bill defines dyslexia for purposes of IDEA as an unexpected difficulty in reading for an individual who has the intelligence to be a much better reader, most commonly caused by a difficulty in the phonological processing (the appreciation of the individual sounds of spoken language), which affects the ability of an individual to speak, read, and spell. Additionally, the bill requires a local educational agency or other agency, in determining eligibility for or providing an accommodation or service under IDEA, to provide equal access to (1) children from low-income families or from families with low socioeconomic status, and (2) other children.

Sponsors: Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]

Target Audience

Population: People with dyslexia worldwide

Estimated Size: 30000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (Austin, Texas)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a teacher, I see many kids struggling with dyslexia who don't get enough help.
  • This policy could make a real difference if implemented well, especially for kids in low-income areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

School Administrator (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The standalone category can focus funds and efforts more efficiently.
  • Concerns about the adequacy of the budget to cater to our district needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Student (New York City, New York)

Age: 15 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's hard to keep up with schoolwork.
  • Hoping this policy will get more tailored help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Software Developer (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could lead to more awareness and better tools for young kids, which I lacked growing up.
  • Skeptical about whether funding will reach all students who need it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

School Psychologist (San Francisco, California)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Redefining dyslexia in IDEA might lead to more specialized interventions.
  • Uncertainty about enough professionals being available to provide these services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

College Student (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Supporting kids early on can change their lives.
  • Unsure how quickly schools will adapt to the new requirements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired (Miami, Florida)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen how desperately more support is needed for dyslexic kids.
  • It's a positive change but the cost of implementation worries me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Parent (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 12.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My child needs more specialized help than they are getting now.
  • I worry about fairness in distributing resources, even if the law says it's equal.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Principal (Houston, Texas)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Broadening the definition makes it easier to allocate specific interventions.
  • There's always a risk of over-bureaucratizing a solution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Educational Policy Researcher (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Idealistic changes must be backed by realistic strategies and funding.
  • Ensuring teacher readiness is as critical as legislative changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $400000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $500000000)

Year 2: $420000000 (Low: $320000000, High: $520000000)

Year 3: $440000000 (Low: $340000000, High: $540000000)

Year 5: $480000000 (Low: $380000000, High: $580000000)

Year 10: $560000000 (Low: $460000000, High: $660000000)

Year 100: $1100000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1300000000)

Key Considerations