Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7593

Bill Overview

Title: Access for All Communities Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Economic Development Administration to establish an online clearinghouse to increase awareness about federal and state programs, grants, loans, and other assistance available to support economic development in capacity-constrained communities.

Sponsors: Rep. Tonko, Paul [D-NY-20]

Target Audience

Population: People living in capacity-constrained communities globally

Estimated Size: 30000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Community Organizer (Appalachian Region, KY)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've always believed part of the battle is knowing what's available. A central resource like this could bridge that gap for us.
  • If this policy works, we could see more grants funneled into projects that the community really needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Small Business Owner (South Side, Chicago, IL)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the more information we have, the better choices we can make, but not everyone in my community uses the internet effectively.
  • I worry that while this could be helpful, it might miss those without reliable online access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

School Teacher (Rural Nebraska)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having an easier way to access information could be a game changer for securing more resources for our schools.
  • I hope the clearinghouse is user-friendly for people who might not be tech-savvy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Factory Worker (Inner-city Detroit, MI)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this clearinghouse actually helps get projects started here, I could see some real change.
  • But honestly, I don't use computers much, so I'd need someone to show me how to use it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 4

Cultural Consultant (Navajo Nation, AZ)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My community could benefit from this if we're made aware of it and it includes resources for cultural economic support.
  • I hope there's outreach to make it relevant to us and others like us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Farmer (Rural Mississippi)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's important to have better access to these programs since they can help keep our farm afloat.
  • If it's truly accessible, it could be a major support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Non-profit Director (Baltimore, MD)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy has potential if the information is comprehensive and kept up to date.
  • I'm curious to see how 'inclusive' of differing community needs it will be.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 7

Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a student, I look forward to seeing how this can aid research and real-world applications.
  • Hoping this heralds more integration of tech and urban development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Tech Startup Entrepreneur (Houston, TX)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A digital clearinghouse is great, but its success will depend on how seamless and robust its integration is for tech-driven ventures.
  • I'm optimistic if it's done right.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

Community Health Worker (Bronx, NY)

Age: 59 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A tool like this could make it a lot easier for us to connect people to health-focused funding.
  • I do worry about the tech gap and reaching those who need it most.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 3: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 5: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 10: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 100: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Key Considerations