Bill Overview
Title: Nonprofit Sector Strength and Partnership Act of 2022
Description: This bill addresses interactions between the federal government and nonprofit organizations. Specifically, the bill establishes in the Executive Office of the President an Office on Nonprofit Sector Partnership, in the executive branch an Interagency Council on Nonprofit Sector Partnership, and an Advisory Board on the Nonprofit Sector. The Department of the Treasury must engage in activities including analyzing and publicly releasing the impact of relevant actions on charitable giving and the nonprofit sector. The Bureau of Labor Statistics shall (1) issue a biennial report on trends in the non-stipended volunteer force, and (2) include nonprofit organizations as a distinct category of employer in certain quarterly reports. The Corporation for National and Community Service must engage in specified activities, including making recommendations to Congress on updating Service Year Fellowships to broaden access to national service to underserved and marginalized communities. The Bureau of Economic Analysis must create a Satellite Account on Nonprofit and Related Institutions and Volunteer Work within its national accounts program. The Office of Management and Budget shall engage in specified activities, including soliciting information from relevant federal agencies that collect existing data on the nonprofit sector. The Government Accountability Office must report on standards for nonpartisan civic engagement applicable to tax-exempt entities.
Sponsors: Rep. McCollum, Betty [D-MN-4]
Target Audience
Population: individuals engaged with or benefiting from nonprofit organizations worldwide
Estimated Size: 250000000
- The bill establishes multiple bodies within the executive branch focusing on nonprofit sector partnership, indicating the government's interest in enhancing collaboration with nonprofits.
- The Department of the Treasury's involvement suggests financial practices and charitable giving trends for nonprofits will be monitored, affecting how nonprofits manage finances and donations.
- The Bureau of Labor Statistics will highlight employment trends within nonprofits, potentially impacting the labor force involved in nonprofit operations.
- Recommendations for Service Year Fellowships aim to broaden access for underserved communities, which might affect beneficiaries of nonprofit programs.
- The creation of a Satellite Account on Nonprofit and Related Institutions will impact statistical representation of the sector, better reflecting their contribution to the economy.
- Standards for nonpartisan civic engagement set by the Government Accountability Office will set operational guidelines for tax-exempt entities, potentially affecting governance structures of nonprofits.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on strengthening the nonprofit sector, thereby affecting those involved or benefiting from nonprofit activities. This encompasses nonprofit employees, volunteers, and beneficiaries of nonprofit services.
- Given the policy's aim to analyze the economic impact and enhance service accessibility, the target population includes a broad spectrum of society, including health, education, and community service beneficiaries.
- The policy will not have a direct, immediate impact on everyone but primarily those closely associated with nonprofit activities. Some individuals will experience indirect effects through improved community services.
- The Cantril wellbeing scores are used to evaluate the subjective well-being of individuals affected by nonprofit services, assuming that enhanced nonprofit efficacy through policy may translate to well-being improvements.
- The budget constraints indicate a focus on larger-scale impact rather than direct financial benefits to individuals, influencing macroeconomic factors like employment and volunteer service efficiencies.
Simulated Interviews
Program Manager at a Nonprofit (Chicago, IL)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this policy is a positive step toward recognizing the importance of nonprofits in our society.
- It will provide us a clearer insight into our sector's economic impact and help us advocate for more resources.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Volunteer (New York, NY)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The recognition and analysis of volunteer work by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is encouraging.
- I hope this leads to better support systems for volunteers like me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Software Developer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's great to see nonprofits being recognized and integrated more into government considerations.
- Policies promoting national service access to marginalized communities can have long-lasting benefits.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 9 |
Retired (Dallas, TX)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this policy can help ensure services I rely on continue to improve.
- Anything that makes nonprofit impacts more visible and sustainable is beneficial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Nonprofit Financial Advisor (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Understanding nonprofit financial impacts helps us advise on optimal strategies.
- The Treasury's reports will provide valuable insights for strategic planning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Graduate Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As someone studying nonprofit management, these developments can inform my future career.
- The policy's emphasis on data collection and analysis is crucial for understanding sector dynamics.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Community Organizer (Rural Kentucky)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might improve how rural nonprofits are perceived and supported by highlighting their contributions.
- Better data could lead to more targeted support and funding.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Small Business Owner (Miami, FL)
Age: 31 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I occasionally support nonprofits and am interested in how these policies may affect them.
- Increased acknowledgment of nonprofits could enhance local community engagement.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Nonprofit Executive Director (Seattle, WA)
Age: 58 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policies that standardize civic engagement and reporting help maintain our focus and resources.
- I hope to see long-term partnerships improve through these new initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
School Counselor (Boston, MA)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The partnerships between government and nonprofits could enhance the resources available for our programs.
- Improved insights into nonprofit impacts can drive more effective collaborations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $60000000)
Year 2: $51000000 (Low: $46000000, High: $61000000)
Year 3: $52020000 (Low: $47000000, High: $62000000)
Year 5: $54080800 (Low: $49000000, High: $64000000)
Year 10: $59459168 (Low: $54000000, High: $70000000)
Year 100: $965771612 (Low: $870000000, High: $1100000000)
Key Considerations
- Establishing new government entities involves both start-up and operational costs; ensuring they have a lasting impact is critical to justify expenses.
- While the policy does not directly cut costs or increase revenues, it significantly influences nonprofit dynamics which are crucial for community support and development.
- A clear framework for effective inter-agency cooperation can maximize the potential benefits of this policy, including better data and resource sharing between federal entities.