Bill Overview
Title: Support International Criminal Investigations for Ukraine Act
Description: This bill repeals a provision that prohibits using federal funds to support the International Criminal Court (ICC). Specifically, the provision prohibits such funding unless the United States becomes a party to the ICC pursuant to a treaty.
Sponsors: Rep. Jacobs, Sara [D-CA-53]
Target Audience
Population: People potentially affected by ICC operations or decisions, especially in Ukraine and involved in international justice advocacy
Estimated Size: 1000000
- The bill is centered on the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is an institution that impacts a global audience.
- Ukrainian citizens are likely to benefit from international criminal investigations related to crimes committed during conflicts in Ukraine.
- Individuals globally who are affected by decisions made by the ICC will be indirectly impacted.
- The global legal community has a stake in how international criminal justice is funded and executed, particularly related to cases involving war crimes and crimes against humanity.
- Politicians and advocates for international law and justice reform may be influenced by this legislation.
Reasoning
- This bill is primarily targeted towards supporting international justice systems rather than directly impacting individuals’ daily lives in the US.
- Individuals in law professions, particularly those involved in international law, may see changes in their work scope and resources.
- Advocates for or against the ICC within the US, a minority of the population, might experience indirect impacts from policy changes related to international justice funding.
- The broader US public is unlikely to see direct effects, as the policy does not alter immediate socioeconomic conditions but could invoke strategic shifts in global justice dynamics.
- The policy's moderate budget over ten years suggests limited direct domestic impact with a greater focus on influencing international justice facilitation.
Simulated Interviews
International Human Rights Lawyer (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a positive step for international justice. It provides more tools and support for holding violators accountable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Graduate Student in International Relations (Chicago, IL)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This reinforces the importance the US places on international justice, crucial for my research and future career.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
ICC Opponent and Political Activist (Austin, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am concerned this will lead to unwanted entanglements and undermine US sovereignty.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 4 |
Professor of International Law (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could enhance academic resources and relevance by providing examples and case studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Freelance Journalist (New York, NY)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This development could increase media attention on international justice, impacting my fieldwork and stories.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Corporate Lawyer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy does not impact my field or daily responsibilities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Policy Analyst specializing in Foreign Affairs (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's crucial for advancing the US role in promoting international rule of law, aligning with my work.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although I follow global news, this policy doesn't change my day-to-day life.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Social Worker (Seattle, WA)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- International justice may help address root causes but seems distant from immediate client needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Activist (Hostel Worker in New Orleans, LA)
Age: 23 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This facilitates international dialogue and aligns with my advocacy for global justice.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $15000000)
Year 2: $11000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $16000000)
Year 3: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $17000000)
Year 5: $14000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $19000000)
Year 10: $18000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $24000000)
Year 100: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)
Key Considerations
- The US's potential role in influencing ICC operations through funding support and how it aligns with national foreign policy objectives.
- Assessment of international legal obligations versus national interests and how this aligns with US global strategies.
- The potential change in perception and relationship with international allies through active ICC engagement.