Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7561

Bill Overview

Title: BAH Restoration Act

Description: This bill increases the monthly amount of the basic housing allowance for members of the uniformed services inside the United States. Specifically, the monthly amount of allowance for a member must be the amount of the monthly cost of adequate housing in the area, as determined by the Department of Defense, for members of the uniformed services serving in the same pay grade and same dependency status as the member.

Sponsors: Rep. Strickland, Marilyn [D-WA-10]

Target Audience

Population: Members of the uniformed services in the United States

Estimated Size: 1600000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Army Specialist (Fort Hood, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My allowance barely covers the rent as it is, so an increase would help a lot.
  • I might be able to save a bit or reduce my debt with this change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Navy Officer (San Diego, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Housing costs are tough here compared to the allowance, so this policy would relieve some stress.
  • I worry less about finances and can focus more on my work and family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Marine Corps Gunnery Sergeant (Virginia Beach, VA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This increase won't make much of a difference for me since I already own my house.
  • It's good for those who rent, but my financial situation won't change drastically.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Air Force Airman (Seattle, WA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I live on base, so this won't affect me unless my situation changes.
  • It's still reassuring knowing the system is being improved for others.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Coast Guard Petty Officer (Boston, MA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Rent here in Boston is high, and the allowance doesn't quite match up.
  • Any increase helps manage the gap and reduces financial anxiety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Air Force Captain (Omaha, NE)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a decent change that will help balance our budget a bit better.
  • Housing in Omaha isn't too bad, but every bit helps.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Public Health Service Officer (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My mortgage is more than BAH, so any increase helps make ends meet.
  • I am appreciative; this will provide more financial breathing room.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Space Force Guardian (Colorado Springs, CO)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With the rent covered, any extra will just help with savings.
  • I think it's a good improvement especially with future uncertainties.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Army Major (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An increase would mean I don't have to dip into savings just to cover housing.
  • It's challenging balancing everything with a single income, so this is quite beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Navy Chief Petty Officer (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Living in Hawaii is expensive, and every little bit helps somewhat.
  • Despite the increase, the cost gap is still there, but this provides a cushion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2448000000 (Low: $1968000000, High: $2880000000)

Year 2: $2485000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $2921000000)

Year 3: $2522000000 (Low: $2032000000, High: $2962000000)

Year 5: $2597000000 (Low: $2093000000, High: $3046000000)

Year 10: $2784000000 (Low: $2247000000, High: $3265000000)

Year 100: $4468000000 (Low: $3600000000, High: $5257000000)

Key Considerations