Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7555

Bill Overview

Title: Armenian Genocide Education Act

Description: This bill requires the Library of Congress to maintain a public website and otherwise support educational initiatives to promote understanding about the Armenian Genocide.

Sponsors: Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-12]

Target Audience

Population: People interested in education about the Armenian Genocide

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School History Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will provide valuable resources I can use in my classroom to teach about the Armenian Genocide.
  • More accessible materials will help counter misinformation.
  • I am looking forward to integrating these resources into my curriculum.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

College Professor (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm pleased to see this initiative, as it supports educational growth and awareness.
  • It could foster greater empathy and understanding towards historic tragedies.
  • I believe this could also prompt more academic research and discussions in universities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Graduate Student (Boston, MA)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more resources on the Armenian Genocide is invaluable for my research.
  • This could help in understanding broader patterns in history education and policymaking.
  • I hope these resources will be easily accessible for all.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Community Leader (Glendale, CA)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act is a step forward for the Armenian community in terms of recognition and education.
  • I believe it will positively influence younger generations by validating their heritage.
  • It’s long overdue and I hope for more such initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This kind of recognition is important, though it comes a bit late.
  • It will provide past generations an assurance that their struggles are not forgotten.
  • I feel this policy can bring about healing for many Armenian-Americans like myself.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

High School Principal (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More information about the Armenian Genocide will enrich our history programs.
  • It could encourage meaningful conversations among students from various backgrounds.
  • I am hopeful it will lead to a more comprehensive educational curriculum.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Software Engineer (Detroit, MI)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don’t see how this directly affects me, but it seems beneficial for historical accuracy.
  • If anything, it might encourage me to learn more about this topic out of curiosity.
  • These educational resources could fill gaps in my knowledge about global history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Policy Advocate (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 59 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns well with efforts to enhance cultural awareness and education.
  • It’s a positive step towards addressing historical injustices and educating the public.
  • I anticipate it will help validate efforts made by advocacy groups over the years.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Freelance Writer (Houston, TX)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This provides new material for potential articles and stories I might write.
  • I'm glad contributions from all nations are being recognized in educational materials.
  • This act seems like it could diversify the types of stories that get told and taught.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

University Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could be a valuable resource in understanding the political context of historical events.
  • It may help in my studies, particularly when examining case studies involving genocide.
  • I think such policies can improve cultural sensitivity and historical knowledge.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3500000)

Year 2: $3100000 (Low: $1600000, High: $3600000)

Year 3: $3200000 (Low: $1700000, High: $3700000)

Year 5: $3400000 (Low: $1800000, High: $3900000)

Year 10: $3600000 (Low: $2000000, High: $4100000)

Year 100: $4000000 (Low: $2400000, High: $4500000)

Key Considerations