Bill Overview
Title: Housatonic Wild and Scenic River Act of 2022
Description: This bill designates specified segments of the Housatonic River in Connecticut as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The designation of the river segments must not impact or alter the existing terms of permitting, licensing, or operation of the Falls Village Hydroelectric Generating Station located in Falls Village, Connecticut, or the Bulls Bridge Hydroelectric Generating Station located in New Milford, Connecticut. The designation of the river segments must also not preclude the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from licensing, relicensing, or otherwise authorizing the operation or continued operation of those facilities. The authority of the Department of the Interior to acquire lands for the river segments shall be limited to acquisition by donation or acquisition with the consent of the owner, and subject to the additional criteria set forth in the Housatonic River Management Plan. No land or interest in land may be acquired for the river segments by condemnation.
Sponsors: Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]
Target Audience
Population: People living near, recreating on, or benefiting from conservation of the Housatonic River, Connecticut
Estimated Size: 100000
- The Housatonic River runs through Connecticut, meaning the primary geographic area affected will be this state.
- Connecticut has a population of around 3.6 million people, but the specific area impacted will be smaller.
- The Wild and Scenic designation impacts local communities, recreation opportunities, environmental quality, cultural values, and local businesses along the river.
- Recreational users, such as kayakers, fishermen, and hikers, will be impacted.
- Residents and local governments in the areas surrounding the designated segments of the Housatonic River may see changes in land use and management priorities.
Reasoning
- The Housatonic Wild and Scenic River Act of 2022 affects a specific geographic area in Connecticut, primarily impacting those living near or benefiting from the river.
- Given the budget and scope, the policy will likely have low to moderate impacts on people, with variances depending on proximity and engagement with the river.
- Recreational users like kayakers, fishermen, and hikers may experience a more immediate benefit from improved environmental quality.
- Local residents might see effects in terms of land management and conservation benefits, but these may not directly translate into significant changes in wellbeing scores yet.
- There is a potential for long-term economic and environmental benefits which might reflect on future wellbeing assessments.
- Connecticut's population is relatively small, but those directly interacting with the river represent an even smaller subset. This selective impact limits the immediate reach of the policy.
Simulated Interviews
Hydroelectric plant manager (Falls Village, Connecticut)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy is important for environmental conservation, but I'm relieved it doesn't impact my job directly.
- I hope this becomes an opportunity for education on renewable energy benefits as well.
- It adds to the community's charm and could bring more visitors.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Civil engineer (New Milford, Connecticut)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improved planning of river segments should facilitate better environmental and public infrastructure development.
- As an engineer, there's a potential for more projects geared towards sustainable practices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Recreational fisherman (Litchfield, Connecticut)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The scenic designation is excellent for preserving the fishing spots I love.
- I enjoy knowing that future generations will have the same experiences I do.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Environmental researcher (Hartford, Connecticut)
Age: 27 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Designating more segments as scenic can result in valuable research opportunities and funding.
- It helps in advocating for similar ecological projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Retired teacher (Bridgeport, Connecticut)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I’m pleased that the historical and cultural significance of the river is being recognized.
- This act will help us preserve local history and heritage.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
College student (Falls Village, Connecticut)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This provides a real-life case study of conservation efforts and policy in action.
- It could open internships with local government initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 7 |
Small business owner (Monroe, Connecticut)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The scenic designation could increase tourist traffic and benefit my business.
- It brings the river into more public consciousness, which is good for adventure and outdoor enthusiasts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Real estate agent (New Milford, Connecticut)
Age: 44 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Environmentally conscious properties are gaining popularity; this act enhances their appeal.
- This could lead to an increase in property values, benefiting homeowners near the river.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 8 |
Retired nurse (Torrington, Connecticut)
Age: 58 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am happy that the wildlife and bird habitats will receive more protection and attention.
- This act makes me feel more connected to and proud of my local environment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Tour guide (Danbury, Connecticut)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy helps promote eco-tourism which directly benefits my work and the awareness of natural resources.
- I anticipate a positive trend in business inquiries and tour bookings.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Key Considerations
- The mandatory voluntary acquisition of land minimizes forced displacement and major cost burdens.
- Impact on hydroelectric facilities and energy generation is negligible due to explicit protections in the bill.
- Federal, state, and local cooperation is required for effective implementation of the river management plans.