Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7551

Bill Overview

Title: Housatonic Wild and Scenic River Act of 2022

Description: This bill designates specified segments of the Housatonic River in Connecticut as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The designation of the river segments must not impact or alter the existing terms of permitting, licensing, or operation of the Falls Village Hydroelectric Generating Station located in Falls Village, Connecticut, or the Bulls Bridge Hydroelectric Generating Station located in New Milford, Connecticut. The designation of the river segments must also not preclude the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from licensing, relicensing, or otherwise authorizing the operation or continued operation of those facilities. The authority of the Department of the Interior to acquire lands for the river segments shall be limited to acquisition by donation or acquisition with the consent of the owner, and subject to the additional criteria set forth in the Housatonic River Management Plan. No land or interest in land may be acquired for the river segments by condemnation.

Sponsors: Rep. Hayes, Jahana [D-CT-5]

Target Audience

Population: People living near, recreating on, or benefiting from conservation of the Housatonic River, Connecticut

Estimated Size: 100000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Hydroelectric plant manager (Falls Village, Connecticut)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is important for environmental conservation, but I'm relieved it doesn't impact my job directly.
  • I hope this becomes an opportunity for education on renewable energy benefits as well.
  • It adds to the community's charm and could bring more visitors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Civil engineer (New Milford, Connecticut)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved planning of river segments should facilitate better environmental and public infrastructure development.
  • As an engineer, there's a potential for more projects geared towards sustainable practices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Recreational fisherman (Litchfield, Connecticut)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The scenic designation is excellent for preserving the fishing spots I love.
  • I enjoy knowing that future generations will have the same experiences I do.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Environmental researcher (Hartford, Connecticut)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Designating more segments as scenic can result in valuable research opportunities and funding.
  • It helps in advocating for similar ecological projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Retired teacher (Bridgeport, Connecticut)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’m pleased that the historical and cultural significance of the river is being recognized.
  • This act will help us preserve local history and heritage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

College student (Falls Village, Connecticut)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This provides a real-life case study of conservation efforts and policy in action.
  • It could open internships with local government initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 10 7

Small business owner (Monroe, Connecticut)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The scenic designation could increase tourist traffic and benefit my business.
  • It brings the river into more public consciousness, which is good for adventure and outdoor enthusiasts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Real estate agent (New Milford, Connecticut)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Environmentally conscious properties are gaining popularity; this act enhances their appeal.
  • This could lead to an increase in property values, benefiting homeowners near the river.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Retired nurse (Torrington, Connecticut)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am happy that the wildlife and bird habitats will receive more protection and attention.
  • This act makes me feel more connected to and proud of my local environment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Tour guide (Danbury, Connecticut)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy helps promote eco-tourism which directly benefits my work and the awareness of natural resources.
  • I anticipate a positive trend in business inquiries and tour bookings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Key Considerations