Bill Overview
Title: For the relief of Michael Ragas Rey.
Description: Provides for the relief of Michael Ragas Rey.
Sponsors: Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]
Target Audience
Population: People impacted by the bill for the relief of Michael Ragas Rey
Estimated Size: 1
- The bill is explicitly directed at a single individual, Michael Ragas Rey, as indicated by the phrase 'relief of Michael Ragas Rey.'
- It is unlikely to have any direct impact on other individuals globally, as the language is specific and personal.
- Such legislative actions are often related to specific personal circumstances, such as citizenship, immigration status, or other legal matters affecting the named individual only.
Reasoning
- Given that the policy is directed specifically at Michael Ragas Rey, the primary impact is isolated to this individual.
- The financial aspect of the policy allows for up to $50,000 in the first year, which can significantly affect the wellbeing of one person, especially if related to immigration or legal matters.
- The long-term budget suggests ongoing support or resolution of his situation, potentially leading to improved wellbeing over time.
- The rest of the population remains unaffected in terms of direct impact, as the policy does not provide benefits or resources to others.
Simulated Interviews
Unknown (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy provides direct relief to me for a personal issue, likely related to either my residency or legal status.
- I am optimistic that this will alleviate significant stress and uncertainty in my life.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 3 |
Social Worker (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Although this policy does not directly affect me or my clients as it is directed at an individual, it is a testament to the rare but impactful role of private bills.
- Such policies can significantly change an individual’s life trajectory.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Policy Analyst (Washington, DC)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The relief bill for Michael Ragas Rey is a specific intervention that underscores the importance of legislative advocacy for individual cases.
- It highlights broader systemic issues in the policy arena that often go unaddressed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Graduate Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Understanding this policy provides insight into how legislative mechanisms can address unique individual needs.
- It serves as an educational case study for reviewing the intersection of law and personal circumstance.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Attorney (Chicago, IL)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While this specific policy does not impact my wellbeing directly, it represents a significant legal resource for those who may face unique legal challenges.
- Such bills are crucial for uncovering individual injustices and rectifying them.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Journalist (Miami, FL)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Though the policy does not have a personal impact, its existence is newsworthy due to its nature of addressing individual predicaments.
- This can impact public conversation around immigration and justice.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Activist (Detroit, MI)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy does not affect me directly, but it's a reminder of what's possible when attention is devoted to individuals who require special legal remedies.
- I support such interventions and seek broader options for many others.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Teacher (Houston, TX)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy serves as an excellent example to teach students how individual cases can lead to private bills in Congress.
- While my wellbeing is unaffected, the educational value is significant.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 31 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Though the policy is narrowly targeted, it raises questions about fairness and accessibility for all who might need similar relief by legislation.
- This policy prompts interest in advocating for tech workers who might face complex legal situations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Entrepreneur (Boston, MA)
Age: 53 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy doesn't impact my direct wellbeing, but highlights an effective advocacy route for individuals facing obstacles.
- I wonder how such processes can be broadened for other entrepreneurs in unique predicaments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Year 2: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Year 3: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Year 5: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Year 10: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Year 100: $50000 (Low: $20000, High: $100000)
Key Considerations
- The scope of the bill is extremely limited to the individual, Michael Ragas Rey.
- Relief bills typically do not result in significant administrative strain or financial outflows.
- The impact on broader fiscal indicators like GDP and tax revenue is negligible.