Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7524

Bill Overview

Title: ACES Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to seek to enter into an agreement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to study the incidence and mortality of cancer among individuals who served in the regular or reserve components of the Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps as air crew members of a fixed-wing aircraft or personnel supporting generation of such an aircraft.

Sponsors: Rep. Pfluger, August [R-TX-11]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals who served in the Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps as air crew or support for fixed-wing aircraft

Estimated Size: 100000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Veteran, Former Navy Pilot (San Diego, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the study could unveil critical insights about my health risks.
  • It's reassuring to know that our service-related health concerns are being taken seriously.
  • I hope this leads to better screening options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

Retired Air Force Mechanic (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this study is overdue. Many of us have suspected connections between our service and health issues.
  • Improved data on our health could aid advocacy efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Veteran Affairs Volunteer, Former Marine Corps Support Staff (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am hopeful for broader attention to veteran healthcare needs.
  • Studies like this can pave the way for more specific healthcare provisions for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Commercial Pilot, former Air Force Captain (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a positive step for those of us still worried about the long-term impacts of our service.
  • I don't expect immediate changes for me, but it's great for the community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Software Engineer, Former Navy Avionics Specialist (Tampa, FL)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good to know studies like these are starting; there could be health issues I am unaware of.
  • I hope they include younger veterans in their scope.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired, Former Marine Aircraft Mechanic (Topeka, KS)

Age: 71 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better understanding of cancer causation could tailor the care I'm receiving.
  • While I likely won't see the full benefits, future generations will benefit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Active Duty, Air Force Flight Engineer (Colorado Springs, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative will help shape the policies I might rely on in the future.
  • Glad the focus is on long-term impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 9

Veteran Advocate, Former Navy Engineer (Portland, OR)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This study might highlight the critical gaps in veteran healthcare.
  • By focusing on cancer, we can address one of the major concerns affecting lives post-service.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Air Force Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could lead to more personalized health strategies for veterans like myself.
  • I hope they look into genetic predispositions as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Logistics Manager, Former Marine Corps Operations Assistant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's never too late to start understanding service-related health issues better.
  • I hope this leads directly to improved screening procedures for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 3: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations