Bill Overview
Title: Improving Federal Investigations of Organized Retail Crime Act of 2022
Description: 2022 This bill requires various federal agencies to develop a strategy to improve coordination with state and local law enforcement entities to address organized retail crime. Specifically, the bill requires the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Postal Service, and other relevant agencies to improve federal information sharing about organized retail crime networks, assist state and local law enforcement in compiling materials and evidence needed to prosecute organized retail crime, and increase cooperation and information sharing with the retail industry and retail crime task forces. The bill also requires the Government Accountability Office to report on private sector and law enforcement collaboration to deter and investigate organized retail crime.
Sponsors: Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-39]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals globally affected by improved investigations in organized retail crime
Estimated Size: 330000000
- The bill targets organized retail crime, which affects retailers across the United States, both large and small. Retail workers, customers, and communities where these crimes occur may face decreased safety and increased prices.
- Organized retail crime can lead to significant financial losses for retailers; hence, retail owners and shareholders will be directly impacted by any changes in crime rates as a result of this bill.
- The general public, especially consumers, could be indirectly affected through changes in product availability and prices due to retailers being affected by organized retail crime.
- Law enforcement agencies at federal, state, and local levels will be involved in executing the strategy outlined in the bill, impacting their operations and resources.
- Individuals involved in organized retail crime networks will be directly impacted due to increased law enforcement efforts and coordination.
Reasoning
- For the interviews, I've chosen a range of individuals directly and indirectly impacted by organized retail crime, reflecting diverse perspectives. This includes retail workers, law enforcement officials, small business owners, shareholders, consumers, and individuals involved in organized retail crime networks.
- The cost and size of the program have influenced the choice of interviewees. The federal budget will be used to increase coordination among law enforcement, impacting personnel in that sector. Retail workers form a significant percentage of the population, so their input is important.
- Crime networks themselves will face direct impact with increased investigations. Their anticipated decline will also affect the economics of retail theft, potentially benefiting consumers and communities through reduced costs and safer environments.
Simulated Interviews
Retail Manager (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The current level of organized retail crime is concerning and affects our store's profitability.
- Increased collaboration between law enforcement and retailers could deter crime and improve safety.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Police Officer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Enhanced information sharing will streamline investigations.
- Resource allocation will be crucial to effectively addressing the issue.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Dallas, TX)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Small stores struggle with the financial pressure of theft.
- Federal support can help us operate safely and profitably.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
Retail Worker (Chicago, IL)
Age: 23 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Safety concerns arise frequently during my shifts.
- Improved law enforcement coordination might make my workplace safer.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Retail Investor (Miami, FL)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The losses due to theft cut into dividends and stock valuations.
- I support stronger crime deterrence to protect investments.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Retired Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 61 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Price hikes due to theft impact my fixed income.
- A safer retail environment would improve my shopping experience.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Organized Crime Ring Member (Houston, TX)
Age: 26 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased federal presence will complicate our operations.
- My future in this business is uncertain with such policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 7 |
Social Worker (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Coordinated efforts could address root causes of retail crime.
- Community engagement is essential for long-term impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Supply Chain Analyst (Seattle, WA)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Theft leads to disruptions in supply chain logistics.
- Improving security could stabilize product availability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Tech Entrepreneur (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy presents new opportunities for tech innovation.
- Partnerships with enforcement agencies are beneficial for growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $330000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $420000000)
Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $220000000, High: $400000000)
Year 3: $270000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $380000000)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The initial cost outlay is high due to the need for investment in technologies and coordination mechanisms.
- Potential savings and tax revenue impacts may not be immediate, relying on effective implementation and operations of the improved strategies.