Bill Overview
Title: IRAN Negotiations Act
Description: This bill requires the President to, within five calendar days of reaching an agreement with Iran regarding Iran's nuclear program, report to Congress describing any benefits that will accrue to Russia as a result of the agreement.
Sponsors: Rep. Chabot, Steve [R-OH-1]
Target Audience
Population: people worldwide concerned with or affected by Iran's nuclear program and international diplomatic relations
Estimated Size: 200000000
- The bill affects international relations, particularly involving the United States, Iran, and potentially Russia.
- An agreement with Iran regarding its nuclear program could affect global security and economic stability, particularly in the Middle East and for US allies.
- US citizens might be affected through changes in diplomatic relations and security policies derived from the agreement with Iran.
- Global citizens, especially in countries involved or having stakes in the Middle East, could be impacted by changes in nuclear policy agreements with Iran.
Reasoning
- The policy has a significant focus on the impact of international agreements on national security and economic stability, which would primarily concern policymakers, security analysts, and those closely following foreign policy.
- Ordinary citizens might not perceive immediate impacts, especially in terms of day-to-day wellbeing, given the abstract nature of international negotiations unless developments lead to a significant geopolitical event.
- Budget constraints suggest that large-scale communication or public information campaigns might be limited, thereby affecting the policy's reach among the general public.
- We hypothesize that individuals in sectors like defense, international business, or energy might feel more direct effects due to potential shifts in geopolitical dynamics or energy prices.
- A range of civic responses should be anticipated, from those who closely track international relations and view robust reporting as essential to those who may trust or distrust reports based on their political affiliations.
Simulated Interviews
Policy Analyst (Washington D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is necessary to ensure transparency in how nuclear agreements with Iran could influence Russian geopolitical strategies.
- The information provided through the President's report will be crucial for analysts and policymakers.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Defense Contractor (New York)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The presidential report is crucial for making informed decisions about defense priorities.
- Understanding Russia's benefits from Iran agreements helps in adjusting contracts and security measures.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Environmental Scientist (California)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm not directly impacted by this report, but global stability is always a concern.
- I hope it leads to more informed international policies that protect our environment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Oil Industry Worker (Texas)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any policy that affects stability in the Middle East indirectly influences our industry.
- I'd like to see more transparency on international agreements.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
High School Geography Teacher (Ohio)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This report would be a valuable resource for teaching students about global diplomacy.
- While not impacting my personal wellbeing much, it enhances our educational discussions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Florida)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The stability of the Middle East affects my business indirectly.
- I am interested in how government policies could impact international trade.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Retired Military Officer (Illinois)
Age: 57 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any transparency in foreign policy agreements is good for the public trust.
- What will benefit Russia is crucial information for security strategy discussions among veterans like myself.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Graduate Student (New Jersey)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Access to detailed reports about international agreements is critical for my research.
- It could shape how future diplomats are trained.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Healthcare Provider (North Dakota)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel that having more updates on international agreements can build a sense of security.
- But it has little direct impact on my day-to-day life or work.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Energy Consultant (Arizona)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policy shifts in the Middle East could alter energy markets; this report would be very insightful.
- Direct benefits to Russia might impact energy strategies globally.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Key Considerations
- The policy focuses on international diplomacy, reflecting U.S. concerns over nuclear agreements and Russian influence.
- The bill requires timely reporting by the Executive Branch, signifying a need for rapid intelligence and administrative actions.
- Implementation costs are low as it involves data gathering and reporting rather than large-scale policy deployment.