Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7469

Bill Overview

Title: James Weldon Johnson Commemorative Coin Act

Description: This bill directs the Department of the Treasury to mint and issue 50,000 $5 gold coins, 400,000 $1 silver coins, and 750,000 half-dollar clad coins emblematic of James Weldon Johnson, an influential writer, diplomat, educator, lawyer, and civil rights activist. All surcharges received by Treasury from the sale of such coins must be paid to the Marshall-Motley Scholars Program, the Stanton College Preparatory School, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the James Weldon Johnson Foundation.

Sponsors: Rep. Lawson, Al, Jr. [D-FL-5]

Target Audience

Population: Coin collectors and beneficiaries of recipient organizations

Estimated Size: 300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Coin Collector (New York)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it’s great to have a new coin to collect, especially one celebrating an important figure like James Weldon Johnson.
  • The funds going to good causes make this an even better opportunity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Law Student (Atlanta)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The scholarships have been life-changing for me and my peers.
  • Supporting future civil rights attorneys will ripple out into broader societal impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 5

Teacher (Chicago)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our local NAACP is critical for community support and education.
  • Any additional funding can expand our reach and programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

High School Student (Jacksonville)

Age: 18 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The school's enhanced programs have allowed us more learning tools.
  • It feels amazing to be part of a recognized institution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Graphic Designer (San Francisco)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I might buy one of these coins as a symbolic gesture.
  • The cause feels more like a personal connection due to the NAACP involvement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired Educator (Phoenix)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Supporting the Foundation is significant for preserving Johnson's legacy.
  • It helps keep his contributions alive in new generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Small Business Owner (Houston)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy seems important, but doesn't affect my daily life.
  • I'm glad to see good causes get funding but it does not alter much for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Civil Rights Lawyer (Los Angeles)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy reaffirmed commitment to honoring essential historical figures.
  • Additional funds may bolster legal programs I work with.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Software Engineer (Seattle)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate the historical aspects but unlikely to buy.
  • These types of policies spend resources without major progress in our field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

College Student (Miami)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Happy to see more funding for historical acknowledgment but impacts not felt directly.
  • Important work done by NAACP supported but it's removed from everyday experience for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4500000, High: $5500000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations