Bill Overview
Title: Energy Security and Independence Act of 2022
Description: This bill addresses domestic industrial base and manufacturing capabilities for specified energy-efficiency and renewable energy systems and technologies (e.g., electric transportation systems), including by establishing a program to provide financial assistance for the construction of new facilities that manufacture components of specified energy-efficiency and renewable energy systems and technologies (or to retool, retrofit, or expand such facilities).
Sponsors: Rep. Bush, Cori [D-MO-1]
Target Audience
Population: People relying on or involved with energy systems and industries
Estimated Size: 200000000
- The bill targets the manufacturing sector of energy-efficient and renewable energy systems, including electric transportation systems.
- Workers involved in the construction of new manufacturing facilities, especially those related to renewable energy and electric transport systems, will be directly affected.
- It also benefits industries involved in retooling, retrofitting, or expanding existing facilities that manufacture renewable energy-related components.
- Communities where facilities will be constructed, retooled, or expanded will be affected due to potential job creation and economic investment.
- Consumers could eventually feel effects through improved availability and potentially lower costs of renewable energy systems and electric vehicles.
Reasoning
- The policy is expected to have significant impacts on those directly involved in the manufacturing and energy sectors targeted by the bill.
- Given the substantial budget, it is likely to fuel job creation in areas with new or expanded manufacturing facilities.
- Indirect effects would likely spread over time to communities through job growth and potentially to consumers through reduced prices for renewable energy products.
- The scoring attempts to capture short to long-term changes in wellbeing, acknowledging immediate impacts in employment and expected benefits from energy advancements.
Simulated Interviews
Factory worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I feel hopeful about the potential for job stability.
- The shift to electric vehicle components aligns with industry trends and could secure my job.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Construction Manager (Houston, TX)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Projects related to energy manufacturing seem promising.
- This policy may provide more contracts and work stability for my team.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Renewable Energy Engineer (Silicon Valley, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding could lead to more consistent project budgets.
- I think it will be easier to pursue new innovations with stable support.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Retired (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 61 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I worry about the environmental impact of new factories.
- However, job opportunities for local youth might be beneficial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Student (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 25 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could influence my career choices significantly.
- More jobs in renewable energy may offer a viable career path.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Farmer (Rural Illinois)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Infrastructure changes could disrupt local farming logistics.
- There's potential for land appreciation due to nearby development.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Environmental NGO Worker (New York, NY)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy aligns with our goals for sustainable development.
- Ensuring the implementation minimizes ecological impacts is critical.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Small Business Owner (Pittsburgh, PA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased manufacturing activities could boost my business.
- I'm hopeful for more contracts if the local industry grows.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Union Representative (Midwest)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring fair labor practices is my main concern.
- The policy might offer new opportunities but also risks to workers if not managed properly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Teacher (Florida)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could serve as a great case study for my students.
- It will be interesting to see how it impacts actual energy usage and policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1300000000, High: $1700000000)
Year 2: $1200000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $1400000000)
Year 3: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 5: $900000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $1100000000)
Year 10: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The policy provides substantial support for transitioning to renewable energies, potentially reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
- There might be a need to balance spending across different energy technologies to ensure comprehensive development.
- The success of the program depends heavily on both public and private sector collaboration.