Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7431

Bill Overview

Title: Don Young Veterans Advancing Conservation Act

Description: This bill requires the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to establish the Veterans Advancing Conservation Grant Program to award grants, on a competitive basis, to facilitate the training and employment of veterans for marine and coastal conservation activities (e.g., coral restoration and rehabilitation). NOAA must coordinate with the Department of the Interior and the Department of Veterans Affairs to implement the program.

Sponsors: Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]

Target Audience

Population: Military veterans

Estimated Size: 15000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

former military logistician (Florida)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a former logistician in the military, I find the transition to civilian workforce challenging. This program could provide the training I need to pursue a meaningful career in conservation.
  • Opportunities in coastal conservation seem promising given my location.
  • Having a steady job that contributes positively to the environment is appealing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

marine biologist (California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not a veteran, but as a marine biologist, I see how this program could greatly boost efforts in conservation.
  • Pairing veterans with existing conservation projects brings varied skill sets into the field.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

veteran social worker (Texas)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program aligns with the goals we have for veterans seeking new career paths in Texas.
  • We can see increased well-being among veterans who gain meaningful employment through conservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

retired navy officer (New York)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The idea of continuing some form of service in a civilian context, like conservation, appeals to me.
  • I feel that training tailored for veterans is much needed, especially in fields like conservation that are new to us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 6

fisherman (Hawaii)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've been worried about declining coral reefs and would love to be part of the solution.
  • My experience in marine environments could be useful if such opportunities were available.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

environmental consultant (Virginia)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this as a crucial step in diversifying the workforce in our conservation projects.
  • Veterans bring leadership and discipline that are invaluable in conservation efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

seasonal ranger (Alaska)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Transitioning to civilian life is daunting, and a career in conservation seems fulfilling.
  • In Alaska, initiatives to protect our coastal regions can definitely benefit from this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

homemaker (Maine)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My husband could greatly benefit from new employment opportunities like those proposed in this policy.
  • It's wonderful to see veterans being considered for roles that impact our local environment positively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

construction worker (Louisiana)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is an opportunity to diversify my skills and maybe transition into a new career more aligned with my interests.
  • Conservation activities are crucial for protecting our landscapes here in Louisiana.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

entering graduate school (Maryland)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enrolling in graduate school for environmental science, I support this initiative fully for creating more job pathways.
  • Veterans often struggle to find fulfilling work post-service - this could change that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $51000000 (Low: $40800000, High: $61200000)

Year 3: $52020000 (Low: $41616000, High: $62424000)

Year 5: $53060400 (Low: $42448320, High: $63672480)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations