Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7404

Bill Overview

Title: The Real Emergencies Act

Description: This bill denies the President authority to declare a national emergency, an emergency or major disaster, or a public health emergency on the premise of climate change.

Sponsors: Rep. McKinley, David B. [R-WV-1]

Target Audience

Population: People vulnerable to climate-induced emergencies

Estimated Size: 100000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Environmental Scientist (Miami, FL)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The inability to declare emergencies due to climate change undermines preparedness efforts in Miami.
  • Local governments may face challenges accessing necessary federal support during hurricanes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 4 6
Year 5 4 6
Year 10 3 6
Year 20 2 6

Emergency Management Coordinator (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Without federal emergency declarations, it becomes challenging to coordinate resources effectively.
  • People's lives may be at higher risk in future storms as support might be delayed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 4 5
Year 5 3 5
Year 10 3 5
Year 20 3 5

Community Organizer (Portland, OR)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems to be a step backward in climate resilience.
  • Our community might struggle with effective disaster response without federal aids during climatic events.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 5 7
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 4 6

IT Consultant (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I haven't faced severe weather issues yet, but I worry about potential future impacts.
  • I think federal preparedness is crucial regardless of the current policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Climate Policy Analyst (Boston, MA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could hinder necessary emergency interventions during climate-related disasters.
  • Federal restrictions might create bottlenecks in disaster management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 8
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 5 8
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 4 7

Retired Teacher (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 63 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am not directly affected by climate events, but I'm concerned about national readiness.
  • As we age, anything affecting national policy could indirectly impact us, so it's a worry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 5 6

Graduate Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It is frustrating and feels like a step back in climate advocacy.
  • Young people like me are worried about our future facing decreased support in climate events.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 4 6
Year 20 4 6

Insurance Agent (Charleston, SC)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Insurance rates and claims might rise if emergency declarations are slower.
  • Our clients would stress without fast responses and clearly available resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 4 5
Year 5 4 5
Year 10 3 5
Year 20 3 5

Public Health Official (New York, NY)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Limited authority for emergency response could risk public health during heatwaves and floods.
  • Long-term impacts include a probable strain on health services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 4 7
Year 5 4 7
Year 10 3 6
Year 20 3 6

High School Student (Boulder, CO)

Age: 19 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We learn in school how important climate response is, and it's scary to think of less support during climate emergencies.
  • I worry about what my future looks like with more restrictions on climate readiness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $300000000)

Year 2: $220000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $330000000)

Year 3: $250000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $380000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $450000000)

Year 10: $500000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $750000000)

Year 100: $2000000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $3000000000)

Key Considerations