Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7382

Bill Overview

Title: Supply Chain Disruptions Relief Act

Description: This bill modifies the treatment of liquidations of new motor vehicle inventory as qualified LIFO (last in first out accounting method) inventory. It allows new motor vehicle dealers to elect to wait until the end of 2025 to replace their inventory for purposes of determining income attributable to the sale of such inventory during 2020 and 2021.

Sponsors: Rep. Kildee, Daniel T. [D-MI-5]

Target Audience

Population: New motor vehicle dealership employees and stakeholders

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Car Dealership Manager (Detroit, MI)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for sustaining our operations, giving us breathing room amidst supply chain challenges.
  • Our ability to remain competitive relies on stable inventory, and this change helps avoid layoffs or budget cuts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 7 4

Car Salesperson (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that helps our dealership avoid closing or slashing commissions is a benefit for us.
  • It’s hard enough with the digital sales shift, so financial relief is welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Auto Parts Supplier (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Financially stable dealerships mean better business for us as suppliers.
  • The relief might keep them ticking over, which is indirectly great for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Vehicle Technician (Houston, TX)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could have some benefit if it helps keep the shop busy.
  • There’s always uncertainty about how much trickles down to us on the workforce floor.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Independent Financial Advisor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • No direct impact on me, but my clients in this sector could benefit.
  • A stabilized dealership market might reflect positively on associated industries.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Software Developer (Columbus, OH)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is interesting but doesn’t affect me directly.
  • I can see how it might help the automotive sector in general.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Human Resources Manager, Auto Manufacturer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Dealership stability can influence our employment in manufacturing indirectly.
  • Any relief helps stabilize workforce requirements and planning on our end.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Small Business Owner, Auto Repair Shop (Dallas, TX)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Healthy dealerships maintain a flow of business for my shop.
  • Indirectly, the policy seems beneficial if it keeps dealers financially buoyant.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Supply Chain Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This helps us understand and plan for the automotive sector's stability.
  • It doesn't change my wellbeing, but influences professional assessments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Public Relations Consultant for Automotive (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will be positively framed to highlight responsiveness to dealership issues.
  • It appears constructive for our clients in the automotive sector.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 2: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations