Bill Overview
Title: Military Vehicle Fleet Electrification Act
Description: This bill requires that not less than 75% of the total number of contracted non-tactical vehicles purchased, leased by, or for use of the Department of Defense (DOD) must be electric or zero emission vehicles (or a federally authorized alternative) and use a charging connector type that meets applicable industry accepted standards for interoperability and safety. The bill also authorizes DOD to furnish electric vehicle charging stations at a commissary store or military exchange for commercial use by individuals authorized to access such facilities.
Sponsors: Rep. Garamendi, John [D-CA-3]
Target Audience
Population: People connected to the Department of Defense, including service members, civilian workers, and families
Estimated Size: 3000000
- The primary group affected by this legislation are individuals connected to the Department of Defense, particularly those involved in the procurement and logistics of military vehicles.
- The service members and civilian workers who oversee vehicle maintenance and logistics will need to adjust to the new electric vehicle technologies.
- Authorized individuals who access commissary stores and military exchanges will experience changes due to the availability of new electric vehicle charging stations.
- There will be broader environmental benefits due to reduced emissions; impacts will be positive in terms of health benefits due to improved air quality.
- The electrification requirement will have upstream impacts on vehicle manufacturers and suppliers, necessitating changes in production lines and supply chain logistics.
Reasoning
- The target population consists primarily of individuals connected to the Department of Defense. Many are military personnel and their families, who will be directly impacted by the electrification of vehicles and installation of charging stations.
- People involved in military procurement and logistics may see changes in their duties and workflow, as new skills and training will be necessary to manage electric vehicles.
- The broader environmental impact will be positive due to reduced emissions, although this benefit is more indirect.
- The policy's budget constraints mean that changes at individual level should be rather modest, based on the allocation of resources toward electric vehicles and charging infrastructure.
Simulated Interviews
Logistics Officer (Virginia)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think the transition to electric vehicles is necessary, especially for non-tactical operations.
- This policy will initially require us to adjust vehicle logistics and supply chain management.
- Long term, I anticipate cost savings once the infrastructure is in place.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Civilian Employee at a Military Exchange (California)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having EV charging stations at commissaries is really convenient for people like me who drive electric cars.
- This policy helps normalize electric vehicle usage within the community.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Automotive Technician (Texas)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Learning to repair electric vehicles is challenging but exciting.
- This policy pushes us technicians to upskill, which is beneficial in the long run.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Navy Officer (Hawaii)
Age: 44 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Electrification aligns with our base's sustainability goals.
- This policy could serve as a model for similar organizations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Marine (North Carolina)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The charging stations will be helpful during duty shifts.
- I see more electric vehicles as a minor adjustment at first.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Procurement Specialist (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Switching to electric vehicles means adapting our procurement processes.
- It brings challenges but also opens opportunities to innovate in contract design.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Environmental Scientist (Georgia)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy has significant environmental benefits, aligning with broader emissions reductions goals.
- The act itself could catalyze larger shifts toward sustainability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 10 | 9 |
Retired DOD Civilian (Florida)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a retiree, I don't see much change for myself.
- However, I believe moving toward electrification is vital for future generations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Base Infrastructure Coordinator (Alaska)
Age: 32 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The addition of charging stations means considering grid upgrades.
- It's a step forward but requires careful planning of resource management.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Army Reservist (Colorado)
Age: 27 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm personally excited to have more charging options on-base.
- It shows progressive steps towards supporting EV owners like myself.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)
Year 2: $600000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $700000000)
Year 3: $600000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $700000000)
Year 5: $700000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $800000000)
Year 10: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)
Year 100: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)
Key Considerations
- The upfront cost of acquiring electric vehicles is higher than traditional vehicles.
- Infrastructure development for charging stations requires significant capital investment.
- Training and adaptation costs for the Department of Defense's personnel for the new vehicle types.
- Potential long-term savings from lower operational costs of electric vehicles.