Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7354

Bill Overview

Title: Preventing Terrorist Sympathizers from Appeasing Terrorists Act

Description: This bill prohibits the revocation of the designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization except by a joint resolution of Congress. Currently, the Department of State may revoke such a designation. Such a designation carries various legal effects. For example, it is unlawful to knowingly provide material support to such an organization. Furthermore, a member of such an organization is barred from entering the United States if the member is a non-U.S. national (an alien under federal law).

Sponsors: Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]

Target Audience

Population: People associated with or supporting designated foreign terrorist organizations, specifically Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

Estimated Size: 1000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small Business Owner (Dearborn, MI)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I understand the need for national security, but I worry about travel restrictions for my family.
  • The policy might be too broad and could impact people who are not directly involved with the IRGC.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 8

Graduate Student (New York, NY)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could affect my fiancĂ©'s visa, making our future uncertain.
  • It seems overly punitive for those wanting peaceful engagement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 8
Year 10 6 9
Year 20 8 9

Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy strengthens national security, which is crucial.
  • However, diplomacy should not be overlooked.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Oil and Gas Executive (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I understand the intention, but it might disrupt international business dealings.
  • Risk of escalation in diplomatic tensions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Software Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Worried about future business opportunities in Iran possibly being affected.
  • Seems necessary for some security assurances.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 9

Retired Teacher (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about being able to visit my relatives easily and participate in cultural events.
  • Security is important, but so is maintaining open international relationships.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 6 8
Year 20 7 8

Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could complicate investments in Middle Eastern tech sectors.
  • I hope it differentiates between legitimate business and terrorist support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 8
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Human Rights Lawyer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about how this will impact refugees and my clients.
  • It can deter those genuinely in need of refuge due to overreach.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 7
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 8
Year 10 7 9
Year 20 8 9

Social Worker (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could isolate communities further and thwart integration efforts.
  • Engagement and dialogue should be the priority instead of limitations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 9

Military Veteran (Austin, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I fully support measures that prevent terrorist groups from gaining a foothold.
  • Ensuring national security should always be a priority.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 2: $5100000 (Low: $3100000, High: $7100000)

Year 3: $5200000 (Low: $3200000, High: $7200000)

Year 5: $5400000 (Low: $3400000, High: $7400000)

Year 10: $6000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $8000000)

Year 100: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $14000000)

Key Considerations