Bill Overview
Title: Securing American Energy and Investing in Resiliency Act
Description: This bill requires the Department of the Interior to conduct certain sales of oil and gas leases on the Outer Continental Shelf by a specified deadline.
Sponsors: Rep. Graves, Garret [R-LA-6]
Target Audience
Population: People employed in the oil and gas industry and affected communities
Estimated Size: 2000000
- The bill focuses on the sale of oil and gas leases on the Outer Continental Shelf, impacting those employed in the oil and gas industry.
- The operations in the Outer Continental Shelf can affect global oil prices, influencing global markets.
- Environmental consequences of increased drilling could impact coastal communities worldwide due to potential spills and habitat disruption.
- International markets might react to changes in US oil production levels.
Reasoning
- The target population includes a wide range of individuals such as oil and gas workers, residents of coastal communities, and energy consumers. These groups will see varying levels of impact from the policy depending on their proximity to the industry and their economic ties to oil and gas production.
- Given the policy targets offshore drilling businesses on the Outer Continental Shelf, it is most likely to affect those indirectly involved or reliant on these areas, including local workers and businesses. However, the financial scale and scope limit the policy’s reach, meaning not everyone in the oil industry will be impacted.
- Environmental concerns are prevalent in coastal communities, where residents may worry about increased risks of spills and impacts on marine ecosystems, possibly affecting tourism, fisheries, and quality of life.
- Economic incentives from increased domestic production may slightly benefit energy consumers in terms of prices, though these effects would be countered by global market influences.
- Resource allocation will be important in implementation, closely tied with budget constraints, focusing on critical lease sales that maximize employment while minimizing environmental risk.
Simulated Interviews
Oil Rig Engineer (Houston, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think it's crucial for maintaining industry jobs. More leases mean more work for people like me.
- There are concerns about the environment, but technology is advancing to handle these. The jobs are important.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 3 |
Marine Biologist (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased drilling could damage marine ecosystems, affecting biodiversity and fisheries.
- Long-term impact on our waters is worrying, and mitigation measures need to be robust.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
Retired Fisherman (Biloxi, MS)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More drilling raises the risk of spills, which can ruin livelihoods in fishing and tourism.
- We rely on clean waters for survival and the industry might not protect our interests.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 8 |
Environmental Advocate (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This bill seems like a step backward for environmental goals and renewable energy.
- Fossil fuel investments should decline, not increase, given climate change imperatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
Oil Company Executive (Mobile, AL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy will likely boost local economies and stabilize jobs in the region.
- We must ensure environmental safeguards are strictly followed to prevent issues.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 10 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 10 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Tourism Business Owner (Miami, FL)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- There's always a worry about spills; even a small one could greatly affect tourism.
- I rely on clean, safe waters for my tours to operate at their best.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 9 |
Energy Market Analyst (Denver, CO)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy might stabilize oil prices temporarily but could fluctuate due to global dynamics.
- Understanding this policy's true impact requires evaluating international market reactions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Coastal Environmental Planner (Galveston, TX)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Finding a balance between development and environmental protection is challenging yet crucial.
- The policy should include stringent ecological assessments before implementation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 8 |
College Student (Pensacola, FL)
Age: 21 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I worry about how local ecological damage could affect my future career opportunities.
- Protecting biodiversity is essential as it links to everything we study and depend on.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 8 |
Petroleum Geologist (Dallas, TX)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- New offshore leases could provide job stability and growth in our sector.
- Balancing economic gain and environmental costs is always a factor to consider.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Year 5: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Environmental impacts of increased drilling activities, such as potential oil spills, must be weighed against the economic benefits.
- Fluctuations in global oil prices could affect the economic viability of new leases and projected revenues.
- Technological improvements in drilling may alter cost structures and efficiency over time.