Bill Overview
Title: To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public airport in use by an air reserve station as a primary airport.
Description: This bill designates any public airport in use by an air reserve station military facility as a primary airport (i.e., a commercial service airport that has more than 10,000 passenger boardings each year).
Sponsors: Rep. Johnson, Bill [R-OH-6]
Target Audience
Population: Users of public airports in use by air reserve stations
Estimated Size: 5000000
- The bill affects airports classified as public airports in use by air reserve stations.
- These could be airports where there is military and civilian traffic, indicating they are likely in or near communities that could have passengers beyond military personnel.
- Commercial airports with more than 10,000 boardings a year will be affected, so it primarily targets airports that already have significant civilian use.
- It may increase funding, improve infrastructure, or offer more services, benefiting civilians as well as military personnel.
Reasoning
- The policy is aimed at improving commercial service capabilities at airports that are also used by air reserve stations, so it is likely to benefit communities around these airports.
- We expect to see improvements in infrastructure, which may increase local civilian air travel convenience and possibly economic opportunities.
- Impacts may vary based on proximity to the airport, the current level of commercial activity, and reliance on the airport for travel or goods.
- Simulations include a variety of individuals to capture a range of potential impacts, from local business travelers to military personnel and residents nearby.
Simulated Interviews
Airport Staff (Dayton, OH)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe this policy could bring in more funding, helping us expand our services.
- It might lead to more job stability and even growth for me and my colleagues.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Local Business Owner (Anchorage, AK)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could boost foot traffic to my shop with more flights and better services.
- I've always welcomed more commercial activity at the airport.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Military Personnel (Colorado Springs, CO)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could mean better travel arrangements and more convenient flights for me and my family.
- Having more civilian flights might also help with travel options for my family.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Travel Agent (Augusta, GA)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improving the airport may result in more flight options and better schedules for my clients.
- It could help my business if it leads to an increase in travel interest.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Local Government Official (Columbus, MS)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might help attract businesses and travelers to our area, providing an economic boost.
- More commercial flights can support local growth and job opportunities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Frequent Traveler (Trenton, NJ)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More services and flights might mean less hassle and better connections for my trips.
- Such improvements could also make the travel process smoother and less stressful.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Retired (Wichita Falls, TX)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 17/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm skeptical of how much this policy will change things for me personally.
- Improvements would probably be nice, but I don't fly often enough to feel much impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Small Business Owner (Charleston, SC)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Better airport infrastructure could increase demand for my rental services.
- I am optimistic about potential growth if there are more flights and passengers.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Environmental Engineer (Knoxville, TN)
Age: 40 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope any expansion in airport services includes sustainable practices.
- There could be concerns about increased environmental impact with more flights.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Administrative Assistant (Shreveport, LA)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Any improvement in airport operations can make supply chains more efficient.
- I hope this policy facilitates faster and more reliable logistics services.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $7500000)
Year 2: $6000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)
Year 3: $7000000 (Low: $3500000, High: $10500000)
Year 5: $8000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $12000000)
Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $15000000)
Year 100: $15000000 (Low: $7500000, High: $22500000)
Key Considerations
- The number of airports affected and the current state of their infrastructure will heavily influence both cost and savings estimates.
- Potential changes in air traffic control and airport management practices could have additional costs or benefits.
- The interaction between military and commercial operations needs evaluation to ensure compatibility and safety.