Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7213

Bill Overview

Title: Equitable Community Access to Pharmacist Services Act

Description: This bill expands Medicare coverage to permanently include services provided by a pharmacist, including incidental services and supplies, related to testing, drug regimens, and vaccines for COVID-19, influenza, and certain other illnesses. Specifically, the bill provides for continued coverage of pharmacist services relating to testing and vaccines for COVID-19 and influenza, as well as coverage of testing for respiratory syncytial virus and streptococcal pharyngitis (i.e., strep throat) and the initiation of drug regimens that are used to treat COVID-19, influenza, or strep throat. It also generally provides for coverage of pharmacist services during a public health emergency or to address health equity. A pharmacist, or the facility with which the pharmacist is contracted or employed, may present a claim for reimbursement of 85% (or 100% during a declared emergency) of the applicable amount. A pharmacist may not bill an individual for such a service other than for the applicable deductible or coinsurance amounts.

Sponsors: Rep. Kind, Ron [D-WI-3]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals globally receiving pharmacist healthcare services for select illnesses

Estimated Size: 70000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired teacher (Tennessee)

Age: 72 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is helpful as it offers more convenient access to required vaccines and tests.
  • Pharmacies are usually closer than doctor's offices, and it's beneficial during emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Software engineer (California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see value in getting easier access to tests and vaccines via my local pharmacy.
  • However, since I have a high-deductible plan, my out-of-pocket costs might remain high.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Freelancer (New York)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this allows me to access tests and vaccines with less cost.
  • I often worry about accessing healthcare services in emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Retired (Florida)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's convenient to get services directly from my pharmacy, especially since I have mobility issues.
  • I'm also concerned about overdependence on pharmacists for complex health needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Small business owner (Texas)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having pharmacists provide these services could reduce the healthcare burden on my business.
  • My insurance covers a lot already, but the reduced hassle is appreciated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

Nurse (Illinois)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a step in the right direction for health equality—access is key.
  • I see first-hand the issues people face getting timely care.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Pharmacist (Ohio)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This benefits both my profession and my community.
  • It positions pharmacists as accessible healthcare providers which is long overdue.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

College student (Washington)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to these pharmacy services without the usual financial burden is reassuring.
  • I often postpone healthcare needs due to cost.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Construction worker (Alabama)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Convenient strep testing and treatments at the pharmacy could be a big relief.
  • I miss work often to see the doctor, which causes financial strain.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Non-profit worker (Oregon)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The bill could significantly improve access for many without reliable healthcare.
  • Coverage through pharmacists helps unveiled discriminatory barriers in traditional healthcare settings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $180000000)

Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $240000000, High: $360000000)

Year 3: $350000000 (Low: $280000000, High: $420000000)

Year 5: $400000000 (Low: $320000000, High: $480000000)

Year 10: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 100: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Key Considerations