Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7207

Bill Overview

Title: Prohibit Venezuelan Oil Importation Act

Description: This bill requires the President to prohibit the importation of petroleum products from Venezuela. Petroleum product means crude oil, residual fuel oil, or any refined petroleum product, including natural gas liquid product. The President may modify or remove the prohibition for some or all petroleum products only if specified conditions are met. Among these conditions, the President must (1) reimplement and maintain sanctions imposed against Venezuela's state-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A.; (2) renew the authorization of the Keystone XL pipeline to import oil from Canada; and (3) resume oil and gas leasing on federal land. Additionally, the bill authorizes the President to use appropriate authorities to impose civil or criminal penalties as necessary to enforce the prohibition.

Sponsors: Rep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]

Target Audience

Population: Global consumers relying on oil imports

Estimated Size: 50000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Oil refinery worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am worried about my job security if Venezuelan oil imports stop.
  • Our company would need to find alternative sources, which could be expensive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 4 6
Year 3 4 6
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Policy analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could redirect U.S. energy strategies, but it may have diplomatic repercussions.
  • There is potential for increased reliance on Canadian oil, changing some economic dynamics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Environmental activist (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm highly concerned about the environmental impacts if the Keystone XL pipeline is reauthorized.
  • This policy seems like a step backward for sustainable energy goals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 3 5
Year 3 3 5
Year 5 2 6
Year 10 2 7
Year 20 3 7

Retired oil executive (Midland, TX)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could hurt U.S.-Venezuela business relations but might bolster domestic oil sectors.
  • Economic adjustments will be necessary, especially in Gulf regions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 8
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Logistics coordinator (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Logistics would get complicated if Venezuelan oil is out of the picture.
  • It might create rerouting challenges, affecting costs and timelines.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 8

Gas station owner (Seattle, WA)

Age: 53 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about higher gas prices hurting my business.
  • Local customers might decrease if gas prices spike.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 7 7

Rideshare driver (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fuel prices already cut into my income, I'm worried about price hikes.
  • I hope this leads to more reliable sources that stabilize prices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 4 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Natural gas company worker (Pittsburgh, PA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The shift might open new opportunities for domestic sourcing jobs like mine.
  • I am cautiously optimistic about employment growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Marine worker (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Changes in petro routes could increase work complexity and job risk.
  • There might be a learning curve with new procedures, which is stressful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Financial analyst (White Plains, NY)

Age: 46 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Expect volatility in the market initially, but possibly stabilization in the long term.
  • Clients may need to adjust portfolios to new oil trade dynamics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $200000000)

Year 2: $160000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $210000000)

Year 3: $165000000 (Low: $115000000, High: $215000000)

Year 5: $170000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $220000000)

Year 10: $180000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $230000000)

Year 100: $190000000 (Low: $140000000, High: $240000000)

Key Considerations