Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7205

Bill Overview

Title: Ukrainian Sovereignty Act of 2022

Description: This bill authorizes civil actions in federal court against a foreign state in which money damages are sought for certain injuries caused by the foreign state's invasion of a sovereign European nation when that invasion has been condemned by the General Assembly of the United Nations and by congressional resolution. This bill is retroactively applicable for activity occurring one year before enactment.

Sponsors: Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12]

Target Audience

Population: People affected by invasions of sovereign European nations

Estimated Size: 50000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small Business Owner (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate that the bill enables actions for those impacted by the recent turmoil. My family back in Ukraine has been affected.
  • I'm concerned about the complexities and costs of initiating legal actions, especially for smaller claims.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Academic Researcher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will strengthen accountability and is a legal precaution towards this foreign interference.
  • The foresight in retrospective applications is commendable, but execution efficiency is what matters.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Corporate Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The potential for damages based lawsuits could deter future unlawful invasions.
  • This bill could increase legal traffic and complexity in cross-border proceedings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 63 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad there is potential for holding invading states accountable.
  • Helping those affected could stabilize some of my concerns, though I worry about governmental follow-through.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Financial Analyst (Houston, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If successful, the ripple of this act could stabilize markets tied to European territories.
  • My immediate relations have doubts about enforcement effectiveness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Non-profit Coordinator (Seattle, WA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Real cases of compensation might present tangible victories for those impacted.
  • However, just the legal groundwork isn't enough - what about practical aid?

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Consultant (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The proactive legal stance could bolster international relations and aid in reconstruction efforts.
  • Realistically, the litigation might move slowly, and claimants could be disillusioned.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Professor (Boston, MA)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The legislation signals critical evolution in global accountability crafting.
  • Yet, funding allocation and prioritizing strategic cases will determine success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

NGO Director (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could pave way for policy frameworks internationally applicable where needed.
  • Strong presence of adaptive strategies is vital for long-term efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 3

Freelance Journalist (Denver, CO)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reporting on this policy's progression could later highlight civic advocacy as a model.
  • Concern lies in where a precedent for compensatory action could lead other nations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $22000000 (Low: $17000000, High: $33000000)

Year 3: $24200000 (Low: $18700000, High: $36300000)

Year 5: $29000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $38500000)

Year 10: $35000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $45000000)

Year 100: $55000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations