Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7189

Bill Overview

Title: School Resource Officers Save Lives Act

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2023 grants available to states and Indian tribes to address the opioid crisis. It also establishes a demonstration grant program for school districts to train school resource officers, security personnel, and school nurses to administer Narcan kits (Narcan is an opioid antagonist that temporarily reverses and blocks the effects, including overdoses, of other opioids).

Sponsors: Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals affected by the opioid crisis worldwide

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Highschool student (West Virginia)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing that the school has Narcan and staff who can use it makes me feel safer.
  • My community has been hit hard by the opioid crisis, and having this safety measure in place at school is reassuring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

School resource officer (Ohio)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy enhances the preparedness of our school staff to deal with life-threatening situations.
  • Having more officers trained can prevent potential tragedies and reduce anxiety among students and staff.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

School nurse (New Mexico)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program is a necessary step to ensure we are ready for emergencies that we unfortunately see more of recently.
  • Knowing how to use Narcan gives me an additional tool to save lives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Parent of a high school student (Florida)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a positive step, offering peace of mind that schools are equipped to handle overdoses.
  • I hope this policy extends beyond just having Narcan available to addressing the root of the crisis itself.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired pharmacist (Oregon)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could significantly contribute to reducing fatalities, but should be part of a broader effort.
  • As someone familiar with Narcan, I see its potential impact firsthand.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

College student (California)

Age: 21 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This makes me feel more secure at school, but we need educational programs to prevent addiction altogether.
  • I appreciate the initiative but wish it included training for students as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

High school principal (New York)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The safety of my students and staff is paramount, and this policy is a big win.
  • While Narcan is critical, we must not overlook preventative education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Teacher at a rural middle school (Texas)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having Narcan in school is an important measure, though resources are limited in rural areas.
  • I wish the program also provided resources for mental health counseling.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Emergency medical technician (Kentucky)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy integrates crucial life-saving training into schools, where it can deter tragedy early on.
  • This is a good move, though constant training updates are necessary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Addiction counselor (Illinois)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy increases chances of survival during overdoses, but we need systemic change in addiction treatment.
  • Narcan is a tool—effective, yet not a solution to addiction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $18000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $27000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $33000000)

Year 3: $29000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $35000000)

Year 5: $32000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $40000000)

Year 10: $35000000 (Low: $28000000, High: $45000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations