Bill Overview
Title: To amend the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 with respect to the definition of land use revenue.
Description: This bill amends the West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 to expand the definition of l and use revenue to include any funds received as compensation for an easement authorized on, above, or under lands at the Department of Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Campus. Under current law, such revenues are then usable for purposes related to renovating and maintaining the land, facilities, and services at the campus.
Sponsors: Rep. Lieu, Ted [D-CA-33]
Target Audience
Population: Veterans and individuals serviced by the Department of Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Campus
Estimated Size: 100000
- The West Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016 affects the Department of Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Campus, which is focused on serving veterans.
- Expanding the definition of land use revenue may increase funding for the renovation and maintenance of land, facilities, and services at the VA campus, directly impacting individuals who use these facilities.
- The primary users of the VA West Los Angeles Campus are veterans who require medical services, housing, and other related facilities.
- The bill may allow for more financial resources, which could improve the quality of services and facilities available to veterans.
Reasoning
- The policy directly aims at improving the facilities and services at the Department of Veterans Affairs West Los Angeles Campus. Therefore, it predominantly affects U.S. veterans and their families who utilize these services.
- Given the budgetary constraints outlined for the policy, the immediate impact might be modest but with potential for larger improvements over a decade.
- Veterans who require consistent and ongoing medical services, housing support, and other VA facilities in Los Angeles are more likely to feel the impact both immediately in service quality and longer-term facility enhancements.
- The cost limitations suggest that while improvements will be made, they will need to be strategically prioritized, likely focusing on the most utilized or most in-need areas of service at the Campus.
- Given regional focus, most U.S. veterans outside Los Angeles will experience no direct impact unless they travel to access these Campus-specific resources.
Simulated Interviews
Retired Veteran (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 68 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The extra funds could really help renovate the older buildings I use for my medical check-ups.
- I've seen a lot of veterans struggle due to outdated facilities; improving them would be greatly beneficial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
VA Hospital Nurse (Santa Monica, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's crucial for us to have facilities that match the quality of care we aim to provide.
- This funding expansion might improve job satisfaction as we see better tools and resources.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Homeless Veteran (Anaheim, CA)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 3
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If they could expand outreach or transportation, I might access these benefits.
- I'm unsure how this policy directly helps me as I don't live near Los Angeles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 3 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 3 |
Veteran Services Coordinator (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy might increase the efficacy of the programs I help manage.
- Better facilities usually equate to better outcomes for individuals seeking help.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Veteran (San Diego, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm too far away to directly benefit, but this sets a precedent for other VA campuses.
- It's a good step towards improving veteran support but more is needed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Veteran Advocate (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 63 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased funding is always a positive sign, but I worry it might not be enough.
- Long-term, stronger facilities could better support future generations of veterans.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Retired (Bakersfield, CA)
Age: 72 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm not directly impacted, but I support any move that benefits veterans.
- My husband would've been happy knowing his fellow servicemen are looked after.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
VA Campus Facilities Manager (Glendale, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Budget expansions are exactly what's needed to update our infrastructure.
- We face a lot of challenges with aging buildings, and every bit of funding helps.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Veteran Affairs Financial Officer (Pasadena, CA)
Age: 53 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm optimistic this policy might allow for more sustainable budgeting for our operations.
- It's a promising change if managed well over time.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Veteran and a Single Mother (Long Beach, CA)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If the policy expands child care or easier service access, that would be great.
- Many veterans in my situation find it challenging to navigate current facilities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $250000 (Low: $100000, High: $500000)
Year 2: $260000 (Low: $105000, High: $520000)
Year 3: $270000 (Low: $110000, High: $540000)
Year 5: $290000 (Low: $120000, High: $580000)
Year 10: $330000 (Low: $140000, High: $660000)
Year 100: $530000 (Low: $230000, High: $1060000)
Key Considerations
- The amendment mainly refines the scope of revenue use rather than creating new funding streams.
- Potential impact on local employment and economic activity due to renovations and maintenance expanded through new definition.
- Management efficiency gains can affect VA operations and improve service provision.