Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7174

Bill Overview

Title: National Computer Forensics Institute Reauthorization Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2032 the National Computer Forensics Institute within the U.S. Secret Service. The bill expands the mission of the institute to include educating, training, and equipping law enforcement officers and others on preventing (in addition to investigating) cybersecurity incidents, electronic crimes, and related cybersecurity threats. The bill requires the institute to develop and share information related to investigating cybersecurity incidents, electronic crimes, and related cybersecurity threats. The bill also requires the institute to report annually on its activities.

Sponsors: Rep. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI-8]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals affected by the National Computer Forensics Institute's expanded mission

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Police Officer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act is crucial as it expands our training and resources.
  • It will enhance our capabilities to deal with increasing cyber threats more effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Federal Agent (New York, NY)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Given the rise in cybercrimes, more training is essential.
  • However, the budget seems limited for nationwide implementation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

IT Specialist (Austin, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems more aimed at law enforcement rather than private IT specialists.
  • Without clear information sharing with private sectors, the impact might be minimal for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Detective (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Additional training would be beneficial but concerns about implementation across different states exist.
  • Long-term impact could be positive if consistently funded.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Cybersecurity Analyst (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy would align well with expanding joint efforts between public and private sectors.
  • Sharing knowledge can decrease vulnerabilities, but execution remains key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

University Professor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy should include partnerships with educational institutions for broader reach.
  • Good step for law enforcement focus, long-term benefit for education could be better.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Local IT Technician (Denver, CO)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Not directly affected as I work in small private sector businesses.
  • It's important for public sectors but indirect for people like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Start-up Founder (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the policy is aimed at law enforcement, tech start-ups could gain insights if shared widely.
  • Stimulates innovation indirectly through improved law enforcement capabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

County Prosecutor (Boston, MA)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act will positively impact our ability to prosecute crimes with better-trained officers.
  • Outcomes depend on effective information dissemination and utilization.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired Cybersecurity Consultant (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy is a step in the right direction, but ongoing budget commitment is crucial.
  • Focus on cutting-edge technologies in training critical for staying ahead of cyber threats.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 2: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 3: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 5: $2700000 (Low: $2200000, High: $3200000)

Year 10: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)

Year 100: $4000000 (Low: $3500000, High: $4500000)

Key Considerations