Bill Overview
Title: Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act
Description: This bill extends the period during which the Department of the Interior may make grants or provide assistance for the Yuma Crossing Heritage Area in Arizona through FY2036.
Sponsors: Rep. Gosar, Paul A. [R-AZ-4]
Target Audience
Population: People living in or visiting the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area
Estimated Size: 1350000
- The Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area is located in Arizona, so the local population in and around this area will be the primary group impacted by the bill.
- The heritage area likely attracts tourists, so both domestic and international tourists visiting Arizona and the Yuma area could be indirectly impacted by any enhancements and preservation efforts funded by this bill.
- Local businesses, especially those in the tourism and hospitality sector, are likely to see impacts from changes in visitor numbers or funding for local attractions.
- Historically, cultural heritage areas can impact local community programs, educational institutions, and cultural groups who may use the area for events or educational purposes.
Reasoning
- The budget allocated for the policy indicates that not everyone in the affected area will experience direct benefits due to limited funding. However, certain groups such as local residents and businesses may see more substantial impacts than occasional visitors.
- Tourism is a significant industry in the Yuma area, meaning improvements to the heritage site could potentially increase tourist interest and attendance, thereby boosting local economies and wellbeing for those owning or working in tourism-related businesses.
- Residents may experience enhanced local amenities, historical preservation, and potential economic growth, contributing to a sense of pride and community well-being.
- In addition to direct economic impacts, increased educational or cultural programming funded by the policy could lead to happier and more culturally informed residents and visitors.
- The policy has a duration of impact that could stretch for many years as improvements and funding take effect progressively, influencing long-term wellbeing changes.
Simulated Interviews
Local Shop Owner (Yuma, Arizona)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this policy will bring more tourists to Yuma, which is great for my business.
- It's important to preserve our local history, and I'm glad to see more investment in it.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 5 |
Tour Guide (Phoenix, Arizona)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's encouraging to see a long-term investment. This should make Yuma more appealing on our tours.
- This supports my livelihood since I rely on places like Yuma for my job.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Retired School Teacher (Yuma, Arizona)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm pleased to see funding for preserving the history I've taught about for years.
- Hopefully, this will boost community events and educational resources.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Graphic Designer (Los Angeles, California)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'd love to see more historical sites being maintained, it makes traveling more interesting.
- Not sure how much it'll change for me personally, but it's great for the area.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Professor of History (Tucson, Arizona)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Additional funding could enhance our field trip experience with students.
- I'm optimistic but curious how exactly the funds will be used.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Hotel Manager (Yuma, Arizona)
Age: 54 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could be a boon for local businesses as more tourists might mean more bookings.
- We've needed this kind of investment for a long time.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
College Student (Flagstaff, Arizona)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Preserving Yuma's sites is vital for historical research, and this policy reassures those of us in related fields.
- Although I don't live there, it's crucial to my studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Travel Blogger (San Diego, California)
Age: 42 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More content for my blog is always welcome, and Yuma's history is part of my own story.
- Interested in how the narrative of Yuma will be preserved or enhanced.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Event Planner (Las Vegas, Nevada)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited about the possibilities for new cultural events in Yuma with this funding.
- Could see more opportunities for collaborations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cultural Historian (New York City, New York)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It is always positive to see heritage preserved, even if it's far from home.
- Unsure how this will directly affect my work, but it's key to conserving culture.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 2: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 3: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 5: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 10: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 100: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Key Considerations
- Duration of the reauthorization is critical in ensuring continuous funding and operation of the national heritage area.
- Economic benefits are dependent on successful marketing and increased tourist volume over time.
- Coordination with local businesses and government agencies is essential to maximize the economic impact of this initiative.