Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7149

Bill Overview

Title: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Expansion Act

Description: The bill increases funding for and expands the disadvantaged business enterprise supportive services program of the Department of Transportation (DOT). The program provides training, assistance, and services to minority-owned small businesses to help them achieve proficiency to compete, on an equal basis, for federal aid highway project contracts and subcontracts. Specifically, the bill (1) increases the annual funding cap for the program from $10 million to $25 million, and (2) authorizes DOT to implement the program at the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Aviation Administration so that small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals may achieve proficiency to compete for contracts and subcontracts regarding public transportation and airport projects.

Sponsors: Rep. Aguilar, Pete [D-CA-31]

Target Audience

Population: Disadvantaged minority-owned small business owners

Estimated Size: 1200000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Owner of a small construction company (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have often found it hard to compete for federal contracts because bigger companies have more resources.
  • This policy could finally give me the training I need to better compete and possibly secure a major contract.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Tech startup founder (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's a positive change, but my business doesn't directly benefit because we're in tech, not construction or transport.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Public transportation consultant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The expanded programs could open up new consulting opportunities that align with my expertise.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Freelance project manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy can help me build the skills and network to finally start my business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Retired engineer, mentors minority-owned businesses (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will be beneficial for the businesses I mentor, giving them the edge needed to thrive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Owner of a landscaping business (Dallas, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've been thinking about bidding on government projects, and this could provide the training I need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Finance advisor (New York, NY)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a good initiative, but my clients won't be directly affected as we're not in the target sectors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Owner of a small airline service company (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As someone already in the aviation sector, this could open doors to larger federal contracts that seemed unreachable before.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Owner of a minority-owned architect firm (Houston, TX)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With proper training and support, we could finally break into the federal market, which has been a goal for years.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Urban planner (Portland, OR)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I appreciate the intent, it's unlikely to impact my day-to-day work much as I don't usually deal with contracts in this specific sector.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $16000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $16000000)

Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $17000000)

Year 5: $17000000 (Low: $16000000, High: $18000000)

Year 10: $20000000 (Low: $19000000, High: $21000000)

Year 100: $40000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $45000000)

Key Considerations