Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7092

Bill Overview

Title: Universal Prekindergarten and Early Childhood Education Act of 2022

Description: 2022 This bill authorizes through FY2027 a grant program for states to establish or expand full-day prekindergarten programs that (1) permit each three- or four-year old child in the state to be voluntarily enrolled by the child's parent, regardless of income, in the program at the public school in which the child would be enrolled for kindergarten; (2) run the length of the regular school year; and (3) are taught by teachers who possess equivalent or similar qualifications to those of teachers of other grades in the school. The federal share of such a grant shall not exceed 80% of the costs of carrying out these activities. Grant funds received under the program shall be used to supplement and not supplant other federal early childhood education funds in the state.

Sponsors: Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

Target Audience

Population: Children aged 3 or 4 years old

Estimated Size: 2100000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Graphic Designer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program could really help reduce child care expenses, freeing up funds for other essentials.
  • I hope the program ensures quality education that prepares my child for actual school.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Preschool Teacher (Des Moines, IA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am concerned about whether the increase in demand for qualified preschool teachers will be met appropriately.
  • The chance for every kid to begin school on equal footing is exciting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Software Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure my son would need this program, but I like having the option and flexibility it affords.
  • There's definitely peace of mind knowing quality options are available.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Farmer (Rural Alabama)

Age: 45 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to such programs in rural areas might still be challenging.
  • The qualifications for teachers sound good but might be hard to meet in low-population zones.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Real Estate Agent (New York City, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • For families who need it, this sounds like a great opportunity to level the playing field.
  • Urban deployment should be relatively smoother but comes with challenges of overcrowding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Stay-at-Home Dad (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome the policy as it eases the transition into pre-K for both kids.
  • Communication regarding how to enroll and participate is key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

State Education Administrator (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The financial cap and state matching fund requirement might strain budgets.
  • We're committed to ensuring the program's successful introduction and operation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Graduate Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy provides a great case study potential for my research on child development.
  • I am excited to monitor its outcomes and long-term effects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Public School Teacher (Boston, MA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having quality and consistent pre-K could make entry to K-12 smoother.
  • Teacher demands will need to be managed so that it doesn't burden the current system.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Entrepreneur (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I value programs that can strengthen the educational foundation but current resources are sufficient for my family.
  • The non-intrusive, voluntary nature is appreciated but more info on broader benefits would be helpful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $8000000000 (Low: $7200000000, High: $8800000000)

Year 2: $8200000000 (Low: $7380000000, High: $9020000000)

Year 3: $8400000000 (Low: $7560000000, High: $9240000000)

Year 5: $8800000000 (Low: $7920000000, High: $9680000000)

Year 10: $9600000000 (Low: $8640000000, High: $10560000000)

Year 100: $11200000000 (Low: $10080000000, High: $12320000000)

Key Considerations