Bill Overview
Title: Ukrainian Independence Park Act of 2022
Description: This bill designates specified properties in the District of Columbia as Ukrainian Independence Park .
Sponsors: Rep. Spartz, Victoria [R-IN-5]
Target Audience
Population: individuals with cultural, social, or economic ties to the Ukrainian Independence Park area
Estimated Size: 150000
- The designation of specific properties as Ukrainian Independence Park impacts local communities, tourists, and culturally affiliated groups.
- Local residents in the specified area will be directly affected by the establishment of the park due to changes in land use and potential increases in tourism.
- Tourists, especially those interested in cultural and historical sites, are a crucial part of the impacted population.
- Ukrainian communities and individuals with Ukrainian heritage worldwide may see this initiative as a cultural recognition.
- The change could encourage more cultural events and tourism in the area, affecting those employed in relevant sectors.
- Cultural and heritage organizations may experience an impact due to increased interest or recognition of Ukrainian cultural events on a global scale.
Reasoning
- The Ukrainian Independence Park Act affects a limited but highly specific population primarily located or involved in the designated area in Washington, D.C. and in the broader Ukrainian community.
- The annual and long-term budget restrictions limit the extent to which physical developments or large-scale events can be enacted shortly. Thus, initial impacts might be subtle unless driven by significant community engagement or media coverage.
- Local residents are most directly affected and their wellbeing could be influenced by changes in neighborhood dynamics, such as noise, traffic, or property values.
- Tourist influx should gradually increase, offering potential economic benefits to local businesses, particularly those in the service or tourism sectors.
- Cultural and social connections to the park could increase wellbeing for those with Ukrainian heritage, potentially fostering a sense of pride and representation.
- Given these points, the average impact on well-being is anticipated to vary significantly, from neutral for some to mildly positive or negative for others, depending on personal circumstances and perspective.
Simulated Interviews
local business owner (Washington D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited about the potential increase in foot traffic from tourists.
- I'm concerned about possible construction disruptions in the short term.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Ukrainian cultural organization leader (New York)
Age: 33 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is an important recognition for Ukrainian culture.
- I hope it brings more visibility and interest in our cultural heritage.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
retired (Washington D.C.)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I worry about the noise and increased crowds.
- I hope the park will be a peaceful place to visit.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 6 |
cultural historian (Chicago)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This park is significant for cultural education and awareness.
- I look forward to contributing expertise to potential events.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
city planner (Washington D.C.)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A good way to utilize this underutilized space.
- Must balance local concerns with tourism benefits.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Ukrainian-American community leader (Los Angeles)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This park is a meaningful tribute to our community.
- I hope it sets a precedent for other cities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
local teacher (Washington D.C.)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The park could serve as an educational resource.
- I'm skeptical about the real impact on heritage awareness.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
college student (Washington D.C.)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's exciting to have more culturally significant sites in my city.
- I hope it becomes a place for learning and gathering.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
freelance writer (Philadelphia)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could inspire more interest in writing about Ukrainian culture.
- I'm eager to see how it develops.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
construction worker (Washington D.C.)
Age: 37 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's a job opportunity but could be a hassle for daily life.
- I hope it brings longer-term stability.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)
Year 2: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Year 3: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Year 5: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Year 10: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Year 100: $1200000 (Low: $1000000, High: $1500000)
Key Considerations
- Public acceptance and support for the park might influence ongoing costs and potential expansions.
- Local government collaboration will be critical in implementing services and maintenance.
- Potential enhancement of cultural connectivity and recognition for the Ukrainian community in the U.S.