Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7055

Bill Overview

Title: Elijah E. Cummings Family Asthma Act

Description: This bill expands various public health activities and related requirements concerning asthma. Specifically, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) must collaborate with state and local health departments to (1) conduct activities regarding asthma, including deterring the harmful consequences of uncontrolled asthma, and disseminating health education and information regarding prevention of asthma episodes and strategies for managing asthma; and (2) develop state plans incorporating public health responses to reduce the burden of asthma, particularly regarding disproportionately affected populations. Additionally, the bill revises and expands requirements for asthma surveillance activities and requires the CDC to coordinate data collection activities to maximize the comparability of results. Further, the Department of Health and Human Services must submit an assessment of current activities related to asthma prevention, management, and surveillance that includes recommendations for the future direction of asthma activities.

Sponsors: Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-12]

Target Audience

Population: People with asthma worldwide

Estimated Size: 25000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (Bronx, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe better asthma education could help reduce my attacks.
  • Efforts to improve air quality would make a huge difference.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Farmer (Rural Georgia)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to regular check-ups and asthma management resources is crucial.
  • Improving rural healthcare services would alleviate a lot of stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 3

Software Developer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of policies focusing on health and the environment.
  • Improved public health initiatives can lead to better quality of life for my partner.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired (Detroit, MI)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Industrially polluted air exacerbates my asthma, policy should address this.
  • I need assistance with managing my condition better.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 11 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I miss playing with my friends when I'm sick.
  • I wish there was more information on what triggers my asthma.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 7 3

Nurse (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 19/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A focus on asthma education can help my patients manage their symptoms.
  • Policy could ease the burden on healthcare systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving air quality will benefit my entire community.
  • I'm hopeful that this policy will make asthma care more accessible.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Consultant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More awareness and education on locating resources would help.
  • I look forward to seeing tangible improvements in urban health initiatives.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Environmental Scientist (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy aligns well with efforts to improve air quality.
  • The focus on education is key to managing asthma better, which will benefit public health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Shop Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 56 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I struggle with accessing medication.
  • This policy could significantly improve my ability to manage asthma.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $200000000)

Year 2: $155000000 (Low: $105000000, High: $205000000)

Year 3: $160000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $210000000)

Year 5: $175000000 (Low: $125000000, High: $225000000)

Year 10: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 100: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Key Considerations