Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7047

Bill Overview

Title: Lowering Costs by Improving Biosimilar Uptake Act

Description: This bill allows for the omission of certain information relating to the strength of a product in a biosimilar application, as determined by the Food and Drug Administration.

Sponsors: Rep. Schrader, Kurt [D-OR-5]

Target Audience

Population: Patients in need of biologics that have biosimilar alternatives

Estimated Size: 30000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired Teacher (Houston, Texas)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've struggled to afford my diabetes medication. If biosimilars become cheaper and are covered by my insurance, it could relieve a lot of financial stress.
  • Switching to a biosimilar sounds promising, as long as it's safe and effective.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

IT Specialist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My biologic medication is expensive, even with insurance. Biosimilars could save me money, especially if they work just as well.
  • The policy might make it easier for people like me to manage a chronic condition without going into debt.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Nurse Practitioner (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased use of biosimilars could help our clinic provide better care without stretching budgets.
  • Patients often skip doses due to costs, so affordability is key to better outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Graduate Student (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The high cost of my medication often affects my study plans, as I need to work more to support myself.
  • If the biosimilar option is affordable and effective, it could change my life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Retired (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not directly affected by this policy right now, I support anything that can help people get the medication they need.
  • Hopefully, in the future, there might be biosimilars for my condition too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Insurance Agent (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The introduction of more affordable biosimilars could help us offer better plans without increasing premiums.
  • This policy encourages competition, which is beneficial for everyone.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired Healthcare Administrator (Miami, Florida)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Healthcare costs are a burden on seniors. If biosimilars lower drug costs, it’s a welcome change.
  • The policy has the potential to ease financial pressures on Medicare too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Marketing Specialist (New York, New York)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this policy as a positive move towards making medications more affordable and accessible.
  • Healthy people might not feel the impact directly, but cheaper drugs mean a healthier society overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Pharmaceutical Sales Rep (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the policy may be great for patients, it could impact my job negative as biosimilars could cut into our sales.
  • I might have to adapt to new market demands and possibly find opportunities in biosimilar markets instead.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 5 6

Primary Care Doctor (Rochester, New York)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful that this policy will allow more of my patients access to the medications they need without financial strain.
  • It also presents an opportunity to push for more policies focusing on affordability and access to healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $25000000)

Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $20000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $15000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations