Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7037

Bill Overview

Title: School Social Workers Improving Student Success Act

Description: This bill provides certain resources to increase the number of social workers in elementary and secondary schools. Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Education to award grants to high-need local educational agencies to retain or hire school social workers. The bill also establishes a national technical assistance center for school social work to, among other duties, develop strategies for improving the effectiveness of the school social work workforce.

Sponsors: Rep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]

Target Audience

Population: Students, teachers, and social workers in elementary and secondary schools

Estimated Size: 60000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Student (Detroit, MI)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More social workers could help students like me with mental health issues.
  • I often feel like there aren't enough adults to talk to about my problems at school.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

School Social Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increase in social workers would greatly help manage my caseload.
  • I hope the policy will also mean better training and resources for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Middle School Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 12 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having more counselors could help kids who are being bullied.
  • I've never talked to a social worker but maybe I would if there was one.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 3 3

Elementary School Principal (Appalachia, KY)

Age: 43 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could mean a significant improvement in student support.
  • Our school desperately needs more mental health professionals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

High School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased social worker support could help manage classroom stress.
  • I hope this policy will finally bring some relief to our workload.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

High School Student (New York City, NY)

Age: 16 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing there's more help available at school makes me feel safer.
  • Social workers can really make a difference if they're accessible.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Parent (Boston, MA)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More social workers could positively impact the school's environment.
  • I'm hopeful this policy will address some ongoing issues we've seen in the school.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Superintendent (Rural Nebraska)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might finally provide resources to attract qualified social workers.
  • Our district has been understaffed for years.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

School Counselor (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More hands on deck would help us address mental health more thoroughly.
  • This policy could alleviate some of the strain on our existing support systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

School Administrator (Seattle, WA)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy provides a real chance to improve student wellbeing across the board.
  • Implementation will be key to success; we need clear guidelines.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 2: $310000000 (Low: $260000000, High: $360000000)

Year 3: $320000000 (Low: $270000000, High: $370000000)

Year 5: $340000000 (Low: $290000000, High: $390000000)

Year 10: $360000000 (Low: $310000000, High: $410000000)

Year 100: $500000000 (Low: $450000000, High: $550000000)

Key Considerations