Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/7018

Bill Overview

Title: Green Postal Service Fleet Act of 2022

Description: This bill prohibits the U.S. Postal Service from carrying out the contract with Oshkosh Defense for the procurement of postal delivery vehicles unless each purchase is at least 75% electric or zero-emission vehicles.

Sponsors: Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

Target Audience

Population: People affected by the U.S. Postal Service's transition to electric vehicles.

Estimated Size: 327000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Postal worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the shift to electric vehicles is necessary. It’ll make my job healthier in the long run since there will be less exhaust to deal with.
  • Right now, I’m concerned about how this affects delivery times and if any of us will need additional training.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Electrician (Houston, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could mean more work for my company and more jobs for people like me.
  • I’m excited about the environmental benefits, but I hope there aren’t too many bureaucratic delays.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 7

Automobile factory worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There’s a lot of talk about how this contract will impact jobs, and it’s making people nervous.
  • If the transition to electric vehicles means fewer jobs, then there’s a problem, but if it creates new opportunities, that would be great.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 4
Year 2 4 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 7 4

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The noise and pollution from those old diesel trucks have always bothered me, so electric vehicles sound like a wonderful idea.
  • I’m all for improving air quality in our neighborhood; maybe it’ll even boost property values.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Environmental activist (Charlotte, NC)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a step in the right direction for national environmental policy.
  • I hope the USPS sets a strong example for other organizations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Small business owner (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The change to electric vehicles could lower operational costs for us if we decide to follow suit, which would be helpful.
  • I’m cautious about how seamless the transition will be and any potential disruptions during the changeover.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Public Health Researcher (New York, NY)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could significantly improve urban air quality, which is crucial for public health.
  • I’m optimistic about the long-term benefits for reducing respiratory illnesses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Software Engineer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The USPS shift to electric could mean demand for better fleet management technology.
  • As someone in tech, I see it as an exciting opportunity for innovation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

College student (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s encouraging to see such a big agency take steps toward sustainability, especially when it’s part of my future career interests.
  • I hope to see more policies like this in the future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Farmer (Boise, ID)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this one are important in tackling climate change, but I wonder about cost implications on other sectors.
  • Making sure it’s not a burden on rural communities is crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 2: $450000000 (Low: $350000000, High: $550000000)

Year 3: $400000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $500000000)

Year 5: $350000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $450000000)

Year 10: $250000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $350000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $150000000)

Key Considerations