Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6993

Bill Overview

Title: Stopping Pakistani Terror Act

Description: This bill designates Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism. (A country with this designation is subject to certain restrictions, including a ban on receiving U.S. defense exports and limits on receiving U.S. foreign assistance.)

Sponsors: Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]

Target Audience

Population: People living in Pakistan and those involved in U.S.-Pakistan relations

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Business Owner (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the impact this policy might have on my business. If new trade restrictions follow, it could complicate our supply chain and increase costs.
  • The potential strain on U.S.-Pakistan relations worries me as it might cause division within the local Pakistani community here.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Software Engineer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy could negatively affect cultural exchanges that enhance understanding between communities.
  • Personally, I might not feel the impact immediately, but my parents worry about the larger implications for family and friends back home.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Diplomat (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Designating Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism will certainly complicate diplomacy efforts and could heighten tensions.
  • Security concerns are likely to rise, impacting our daily operations and personal safety while in the region.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 9
Year 2 7 9
Year 3 6 9
Year 5 6 9
Year 10 7 9
Year 20 8 9

Military Personnel (Houston, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This designation could lead to changes in military strategy and operations on the ground.
  • I anticipate that there will be increased diplomatic discussions, possibly affecting our missions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

University Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried that our travel plans might be heavily affected by this new designation and the subsequent implications it may have on tourism and security.
  • As a student of international relations, I find it fascinating yet concerning how this could change our discussions in class and influence future U.S. foreign policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 8 9
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Retired Diplomat (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The impact of this designation could be far-reaching beyond immediate foreign aid and defense concerns, influencing attitudes in international relations.
  • Our community in San Francisco may experience divisions or tensions influenced by broader geopolitical views.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Tech Entrepreneur (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My company might face logistical hurdles if trade or data exchange is inhibited under this policy.
  • This policy needs to be carefully managed to avoid further disrupting economic ties or sparking industry uncertainty.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Non-profit Director (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Limits on U.S. foreign assistance could severely impact our education initiatives in Pakistan, affecting thousands of students we work with.
  • This policy might also influence the donor attitudes, affecting funding and support for our programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 8
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 9
Year 20 8 9

Academic Researcher (Miami, FL)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could become a new paradigm in my research, providing a wealth of new data but also potentially complicating fieldwork in Pakistan.
  • Academically, it offers challenges and opportunities, but personally, I worry about access to resources and collaborations with Pakistani scholars.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Taxi Driver (Newark, NJ)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure how this policy will affect me directly, but I'm cautious about the potential fallout on family abroad.
  • Anything that affects U.S.-Pakistan relations could make sending money home more difficult if restrictions increase.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $60000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $75000000)

Year 2: $58000000 (Low: $43000000, High: $73000000)

Year 3: $56000000 (Low: $41000000, High: $71000000)

Year 5: $54000000 (Low: $39000000, High: $69000000)

Year 10: $50000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $65000000)

Year 100: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $40000000)

Key Considerations