Bill Overview
Title: Ukraine Humanitarian Support Act of 2022
Description: This bill authorizes the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development to provide humanitarian assistance to address the urgent needs of Ukrainians fleeing Ukraine and those internally displaced within Ukraine. The State Department must also report to Congress a strategy for working with foreign governments and multilateral organizations to address the humanitarian situation in the region as a result of further invasion of Ukraine by Russia.
Sponsors: Rep. Keating, William R. [D-MA-9]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals affected by the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine due to conflict
Estimated Size: 5000
- The bill is intended to provide humanitarian assistance to Ukrainians affected by conflict, which includes those fleeing the country and those who are internally displaced.
- The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) estimates millions of people have been affected and displaced by the conflict in Ukraine, including both refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs).
- Humanitarian aid often involves food, shelter, medical care, and other necessities for survival in crisis situations.
- The conflict in Ukraine has generated a large-scale humanitarian crisis, affecting not only those who have fled Ukraine to other countries but also those who have been unable to leave or chosen to stay within Ukraine.
- The global community and multilateral organizations have been involved in humanitarian efforts since the inception of the conflict.
Reasoning
- The policy is primarily designed to assist Ukrainians affected by the conflict, but it also impacts Americans involved in the aid process, such as diplomats and aid workers.
- Given the budget of $2,500,000,000 in the first year and $25,000,000,000 over 10 years, it is crucial to estimate the reach and efficacy of the aid provided.
- The target population in the U.S. is relatively small, primarily involving personnel engaged in delivering aid and supporting operations.
- The policy may not directly impact the general U.S. population's wellbeing scores significantly as it is focused on international humanitarian assistance.
- Some U.S. citizens might perceive indirect benefits through global stability and diplomatic cooperation.
- The simulation involves a diversity of views from those impacted versus not impacted.
Simulated Interviews
Foreign Service Officer (Washington D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is crucial for supporting Ukrainian refugees and aligns with our humanitarian values.
- It provides an opportunity to strengthen international alliances.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
NGO Worker (New York)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The act provides essential support to our NGO's efforts in Ukraine.
- It's personal for me because of my family in Ukraine, so it's reassuring to see this aid.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Economist (Boston)
Age: 57 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- From an economic perspective, the policy is a substantial financial commitment but necessary for humanitarian reasons.
- The U.S. must maintain leadership in global aid efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Tech Worker (San Francisco)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm glad the U.S. is helping with the crisis, but it's not something that affects my daily life directly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Journalist (Chicago)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Providing aid to Ukraine is essential to show solidarity and support against Russian aggression.
- I'm concerned about how this will affect U.S. foreign policy focus and budget allocations in other areas.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Teacher (Houston)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I teach my students about current events, including this humanitarian crisis. It’s important for them to understand global issues.
- The policy is necessary, but in terms of direct impact, it doesn't affect me much.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired (Los Angeles)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's good to see the U.S. taking an active role in providing aid to Ukraine.
- I'd like to see focus on transparency and effectiveness in delivering aid.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Contractor for USAID (Atlanta)
Age: 36 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy directly affects my work, ensuring we have the resources to assist effectively.
- It’s rewarding to see the tangible impact on those in need.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Student (Miami)
Age: 25 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy aids my academic interest, providing real-world case studies.
- While academically relevant to me, it doesn't change my daily life significantly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Nurse (Seattle)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The increased funding and aid translate into better support systems for displaced Ukrainians we see locally.
- Provides assurance that our work here has global backing.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2500000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $3000000000)
Year 2: $2500000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $3000000000)
Year 3: $2500000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $3000000000)
Year 5: $2500000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $3000000000)
Year 10: $2500000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $3000000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Long-term geopolitical stability in Eastern Europe and its implications for U.S. national security.
- Capability and logistics of the U.S. in providing large-scale humanitarian relief.
- Coordination with international organizations and affected countries to maximize aid effectiveness.
- Maintaining transparency and accountability in the distribution and use of funds.