Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6979

Bill Overview

Title: Stop Onerous Surcharges Act

Description: This bill requires U.S. representatives to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to advocate and vote for an immediate review of the IMF's surcharge policies and a suspension of such surcharges while the review is underway.

Sponsors: Rep. Garcia, Jesus G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4]

Target Audience

Population: People in countries indebted to the IMF impacted by surcharge policies

Estimated Size: 10000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

International Finance Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The surcharges by the IMF are a significant burden on economies trying to stabilize. This review is necessary but having U.S. representatives push for it is more symbolic and indirect in impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Tech Entrepreneur (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've invested in a start-up in a country paying these IMF surcharges. If they can redirect their resources, it might boost their growth, which is great for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

University Student (Denver, CO)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's crucial to address international financial fairness. While this doesn't impact me directly, it aligns with my belief in equitable global policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Oil Industry Executive (Houston, TX)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could reduce funding allocated to essential infrastructure projects in countries I'm involved with, potentially changing business dynamics favorably.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

NGO Worker focusing on Latin America (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A move towards suspending IMF surcharges helps free up national resources for using in healthcare and education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Policy Advisor (Washington, DC)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While this is a step in the right direction diplomatically, its direct impact on the U.S. is minimal beyond international relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Freelance Journalist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's interesting to see the U.S. take more responsibility in international financial fairness; however, direct benefits within the U.S. will be limited.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

International Trade Specialist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If my client nations are less encumbered by surcharges, their purchasing power might increase, benefiting trade.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Tech Consultant (Seattle, WA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While my day-to-day life won't change, those in countries burdened by debt could benefit. It might indirectly make my services more affordable in those regions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Manufacturing Manager (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reducing financial pressures on client countries would allow them to order more, likely benefiting my business indirectly in the long term.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $9000000)

Key Considerations