Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6947

Bill Overview

Title: Freedom from Russian Energy Enterprise and Domestic Oil Maximization Act

Description: This bill directs the President to prohibit imports of crude oil, petroleum, petroleum products, and liquified natural gas from Russia. It also (1) authorizes the construction and operation of the TransCanada Keystone Pipeline to import oil from Canada into the United States, and (2) nullifies the Executive Order titled Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad and signed January 27, 2021.

Sponsors: Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

Target Audience

Population: People who rely on global energy markets

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Petroleum Engineer (Houston, TX)

Age: 46 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might boost job security within U.S. oil industries.
  • Potential for increased project funding but concern over environmental impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Environmental Scientist (Bismarck, ND)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Concerned the policy reverses climate action progress.
  • Against the Keystone Pipeline due to ecological risks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 4 5
Year 5 3 4
Year 10 3 3
Year 20 2 3

Software Developer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Worried about the rollback of renewable energy investments.
  • Sees potential tech innovation in energy storage more crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Retired School Teacher (Topeka, KS)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Worries about rising household energy costs.
  • Hopes for stable or reduced prices due to domestic production changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Truck Driver (Pittsburgh, PA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any changes in oil supply affect fuel prices directly impacting my costs.
  • Hopes domestic oil boosts lead to stable prices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 4 3

Financial Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy makes U.S. oil investments more interesting but cautions about global market uncertainties.
  • Environmental repercussions could offset economic gains.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Small Business Owner (Restaurant) (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Higher costs might squeeze margins if energy prices rise.
  • Hopes policy leads to reduced energy volatility.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

Retired Oil Industry Executive (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sees strategic opportunity in domestic production boosts.
  • Cautious about long-term policy effects on renewables inclusion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

College Student (Boulder, CO)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy seems like a step back in climate action.
  • Worries about future career prospects in renewable energy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Gas Station Owner (Dallas, TX)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy could stabilize prices for consumers.
  • Uncertain if benefits outweigh potential geopolitical risks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 2: $1000000000 (Low: $750000000, High: $1250000000)

Year 3: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $400000000)

Year 10: $100000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $150000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations