Bill Overview
Title: Baltimore National Heritage Area Reauthorization Act
Description: This bill extends the authority of the Department of the Interior to provide any assistance for the Baltimore National Heritage Area in Maryland through March 30, 2036. It also revises the map and modifies the boundaries of the heritage area.
Sponsors: Rep. Mfume, Kweisi [D-MD-7]
Target Audience
Population: People impacted by the Baltimore National Heritage Area's operations and development
Estimated Size: 200000
- The Baltimore National Heritage Area is located in the city of Baltimore, Maryland.
- Heritage areas typically impact local residents through community development, conservation, tourism, and educational initiatives.
- Changes to boundaries and financial support mean more areas or different areas within Baltimore could be included or affected.
- Legislation like this tends to impact people who live within heritage area boundaries as well as those who visit for tourism or educational purposes.
Reasoning
- The policy's budget is limited, which means not all residents will experience significant changes. Some residents living closer to new areas included in the heritage area are likely to see more direct impacts.
- Tourism is a major component of heritage areas; thus, businesses within the area that cater to tourists could benefit. Residents of these areas might see changes to foot traffic or business revenue.
- Given the cultural and conservation focus of the heritage area, longtime residents, historians, educators, or conservationists might have significant engagement with policy outcomes.
- The policy duration extends spending into the future, implying longer-term development and conservation goals. The immediate impact may be low, but it will gain higher significance over time.
- Some residents and businesses might not be directly impacted if they don't engage in tourism or conservation-driven activities even if they live in proximity.
Simulated Interviews
local business owner (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a local business owner, I hope the policy brings more tourists to the area. It could increase our sales significantly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
historic preservationist (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This reauthorization is crucial for ongoing and future conservation projects within the heritage area. It's a positive move for preserving our history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 10 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
tour guide (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm optimistic that with increased support, more people will be interested in our historical tours. It's a chance to educate more people about Baltimore's rich history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
retired (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope the changes won’t disrupt the tranquility of the neighborhoods, although it's good for the city to preserve our heritage.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
city planner (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 38 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The reauthorization offers a chance to align heritage area goals with broader city development strategies. It's an exciting opportunity for planners.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
educator (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More funding could mean more educational resources and field trips to heritage sites, which are incredibly valuable for students.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
federal employee (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Though I work with these policies, I feel the impact personally is limited as I'm not a Baltimore resident.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
shopper at local farmers market (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope all these changes will bring more local events and markets that keep the community vibrant.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
student (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The reauthorization could increase access to archives and research sites crucial for my studies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
artist (Baltimore, MD)
Age: 41 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The heritage area provides ample inspiration for my work. Any policy that supports it is beneficial for me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 2: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)
Year 3: $3100000 (Low: $2600000, High: $3600000)
Year 5: $3200000 (Low: $2700000, High: $3700000)
Year 10: $3500000 (Low: $3000000, High: $4000000)
Year 100: $6000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $7000000)
Key Considerations
- The Heritage Area's impact on local jobs and economic activity may depend on additional local and state investments beyond federal support.
- Future changes in federal budget priorities could affect subsequent funding allocations.
- Engagement and participation of local communities in heritage area activities could enhance or limit the program's success.