Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6909

Bill Overview

Title: For the relief of Tetyana Zvarychuk.

Description: Provides for the relief of Tetyana Zvarychuk.

Sponsors: Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Target Audience

Population: Tetyana Zvarychuk

Estimated Size: 0

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Lawyer (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's interesting that such specific legislation can be passed to help an individual.
  • It highlights the potential for the system to support individuals, but also raises questions about fairness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Human Rights Activist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While this bill helps one individual, it highlights the need for broader systemic change.
  • I'm hopeful, but also aware of the limits of such targeted policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Software Engineer (Houston, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's great that the system can address individual cases, but what about others in similar situations?
  • Maybe it could open doors for more comprehensive policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Public Policy Professor (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This type of policy is fascinating as a case study—how exceptions are made and why.
  • It could serve as an important precedent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could be a step forward or a distraction from larger issues.
  • Curious to see whether this is replicated for others.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Non-profit Worker (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate that someone is benefiting from this, but it feels like a drop in the ocean.
  • Hope it leads to more comprehensive policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Government Worker (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've seen similar cases; they are rare but vital.
  • It's encouraging to see our work tangibly help an individual.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Social Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Excited for Tetyana but worried it's an isolated case.
  • It points to need for wider policy changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Journalist (Boston, MA)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I can see the merit in highlighting individual stories for change.
  • However, I worry it might isolate focus from the broader needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Entrepreneur (Miami, FL)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Always good to hear about policies helping people.
  • Curious about the criteria used and the potential for broader application.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000 (Low: $1000, High: $10000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations