Bill Overview
Title: Securing the Checkpoint Property Screening System (S-CPSS) Act of 2022
Description: This bill establishes requirements related to the Checkpoint Property Screening System program, through which the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) procures and deploys computed tomography equipment for screening carry-on baggage at airport checkpoints. Specifically, the TSA must support small businesses with respect to research and development of technologies under consideration for the program. Additionally, the TSA must brief the appropriate congressional committees at specified intervals regarding planned procurement and deployment efforts of such equipment. If the TSA intends to make an award to a system that does not satisfy the program's key performance parameters, it shall brief such committees at least two weeks prior to any such award regarding why such award is necessary and in the best interest of national security and good government.
Sponsors: Rep. Katko, John [R-NY-24]
Target Audience
Population: Air travel passengers and associated stakeholders
Estimated Size: 730000000
- The primary impact will be on air travel passengers, as TSA screening improvements directly affect their travel experience.
- Airports where the TSA deploys new screening equipment will also be impacted by any operational changes.
- TSA personnel who operate the screening equipment will be affected by any changes in technology and procedures.
- Small businesses that the TSA is required to support will be positively impacted through potential contracts and research opportunities.
- The bill requires TSA to brief congressional committees, impacting how legislators oversee and understand TSA procurement activities.
Reasoning
- Air travel passengers, who make up a large portion of the population, could see a variety of impacts depending on how the new screening technologies affect efficiency and security at airports.
- TSA personnel may experience changes in their job roles, requiring retraining but possibly improving efficiency.
- Small businesses involved in technology development and procurement could benefit significantly from this policy through new contracts and development opportunities.
- Many passengers may not notice a direct impact on their wellbeing from these changes, especially if they don't travel frequently.
- For some frequent travelers, improvements in screening speed and security accuracy could enhance their travel experience, affecting their wellbeing positively.
Simulated Interviews
Frequent Flyer (Business Consultant) (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a frequent traveler, any improvement in TSA procedures is welcome.
- Delays at security can be frustrating and impact my job.
- I'm hopeful that new tech means faster and more efficient screenings.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Small Business Owner (Austin, TX)
Age: 28 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy is very exciting for my business.
- Government contracts can be a huge boost for small companies like mine.
- With support, we can innovate more in the security tech space.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 4 |
TSA Officer (Chicago, IL)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I've seen the inefficiencies in our current system firsthand.
- New equipment might mean more training, but also less stress in the long run.
- I hope this makes the job easier and travel safer.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Occasional Traveler (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't fly often, so I'm not too concerned with TSA changes.
- If it makes the process smoother when I do travel, that's a plus.
- It seems like a lot of money for airport stuff, though.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Legislative Aide (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 63 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy adds to our workload but is essential for safety.
- Transparency in TSA procurement is crucial for national security.
- Frequent updates will help keep us accountable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Airport Operations Manager (Miami, FL)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Operational changes are always challenging initially.
- I'm optimistic about long-term benefits of new tech for passenger satisfaction.
- Proper implementation could reduce delays and complaints.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Technology Researcher (Boston, MA)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The TSA's investment in R&D could lead to partnerships with institutions like mine.
- Innovations in screening can have broader applications beyond airports.
- It's a promising time for tech development in security.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Digital Nomad (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Screening is always a hassle, so improvements are appreciated.
- Anything that speeds up the process without security risks is a win.
- I travel light, so tech focusing on carry-on bags is relevant to me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Lawyer (International Cases) (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Delays can cause missed flights and important meetings.
- An improved system might make my travel less hectic.
- Security is important, but efficiency can't be ignored.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Family Traveler (Seattle, WA)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Traveling with kids is stressful; shorter lines would help a lot.
- I'm glad TSA is looking to improve; it makes family trips more enjoyable.
- Safety and speed are both priorities for us.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)
Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $65000000)
Year 3: $53000000 (Low: $43000000, High: $63000000)
Year 5: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 10: $45000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $55000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Implementation of advanced screening systems necessitates robust support and training for TSA employees.
- Ongoing maintenance and updating of technology is critical to ensure continued effectiveness and resilience against evolving threats.
- Small businesses will require guidance and access to resources to effectively contribute to R&D efforts.