Bill Overview
Title: No Backdoor Gun Control Act of 2022
Description: This bill removes the category of any other weapon from the definition of firearm under the National Firearms Act. The bill treats persons who acquire or possess any other weapon as meeting registration or licensing requirements under the National Firearms Act. The bill requires the Department of Justice to destroy any records relating to the registration of any other weapon not later than one year after the enactment of this bill.
Sponsors: Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals owning or seeking to own 'any other weapons' as defined by the National Firearms Act
Estimated Size: 3500000
- The bill affects the definition and regulatory treatment of 'any other weapon' under the National Firearms Act, impacting individuals who currently own or wish to acquire these weapons.
- The National Firearms Act has a registration mechanism that affects firearm owners heavily, particularly those interested in niche categories like 'any other weapon.'
- People who own 'any other weapons,' which include items that do not fit neatly into categories like rifles, shotguns, or handguns, will be directly affected as they gain more leniency and privacy in registration.
- The Department of Justice is a U.S. entity, so the jurisdiction affected is primarily within the United States.
Reasoning
- The policy changes the registration requirements for a specific class of weapons, affecting the wellbeing of those who have a stake in this system, with gun enthusiasts and some security personnel potentially benefitting most.
- It's anticipated that the policy will have a varied impact on individuals, given the niche nature of 'any other weapons.' An emphasis has been given to those directly affected by regulations on weapon registration.
- While the bill might simplify procedures for certain gun owners by relaxing registration controls, it poses little to no effect on individuals who do not own or are not interested in these specific types of firearms.
- Budget considerations focused on the number of people impacted rather than infrastructure changes as the major cost drivers are registry changes and administration adjustments.
- The timeframe for wellbeing scores post-policy extend to 20 years to capture long-term effects in behavior, gun ownership satisfaction, and perceived governmental trust due to deregulation.
- The diversity of the selected interviews helps cover multiple perspectives—urban vs rural, employed vs retired, and across different occupations involving security, law enforcement, hobbyists, and general citizens.
Simulated Interviews
Private Security Contractor (Texas)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Finally, less hassle with the registration process means more focus on my job and hobbies.
- I believe this encourages responsible ownership without the bureaucratic headache.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Gunsmith (Nevada)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Altering the NFA will make my business more streamlined.
- My clients will definitely appreciate fewer hoops to jump through.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Retired Army (Illinois)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The removal of needless regulations is a step forward.
- It's good to see the administration finally cutting red tape.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Software Developer (California)
Age: 27 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy worries me as it may lead to less oversight on firearm ownership.
- I hope this is part of a broader dialogue on safety and regulation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 6 |
Police Officer (Florida)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The risk is that this could lead to more untraceable weapons on the street.
- Would prefer policies enhancing safety measures rather than loosening them.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 6 |
Firearms Instructor (Virginia)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I view this change positively as it aligns with safe but liberated gun ownership.
- The destruction of records concerns me slightly; there should be some oversight mechanism.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Historian (Ohio)
Age: 41 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's intriguing how this will affect future studies on gun legislation.
- Concern lies in ignoring evidence-based policy creation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Student (New York)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Rethinking legislation to reflect current societal threats is crucial.
- Perhaps balance between rights and responsibilities is needed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 6 |
Retired (Arizona)
Age: 68 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Feeling liberated from unnecessary bureaucratic ties is uplifting.
- Privacy remains paramount in owning a gun of any sort.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Lawyer (Pennsylvania)
Age: 36 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This shift can simplify legal processes.
- It’s positive for clients but vigilance is necessary if records are being destroyed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $70000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $15000000)
Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $15000000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $8000000)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Potential for increased demand for 'any other weapons' due to eased registration requirements.
- Changes could influence the broader debate on firearm regulation and federal oversight.
- Possible adjustments need to be made in enforcement and challenge handling related to redefined firearm categories.