Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6805

Bill Overview

Title: African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Act

Description: This bill directs the Department of the Interior to establish the United States African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Program within the National Park Service (NPS). In carrying out the program, Interior may make grants to other federal agencies; state, local, and tribal governments; other public entities; educational institutions; historic preservation groups; and private nonprofit organizations for the identification of historic African-American burial grounds, the preservation and restoration of African-American burial grounds, the interpretation of African-American burial grounds, and related research and documentation for historic African-American burial grounds.

Sponsors: Rep. Adams, Alma S. [D-NC-12]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals connected to historic African-American burial grounds

Estimated Size: 80000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Historian (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for preserving an important part of African-American history that has long been neglected.
  • It will provide necessary funds for much-needed research and preservation work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Retired Teacher (Richmond, VA)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm relieved that finally something is being done to respect and preserve our ancestors' resting places.
  • This might also be a learning opportunity for younger generations to understand their heritage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Nonprofit Organizer (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program is a step towards acknowledging and preserving African-American contributions and history.
  • However, I am concerned about the allocation and whether smaller sites will be prioritized.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

Engineer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good that efforts are being made to preserve history, even if it doesn't affect me personally.
  • I hope this leads to broader awareness and education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Archaeologist (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will greatly enhance our research capabilities and help safeguard these vital sites.
  • There are concerns about long-term funding and site prioritization.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Community Leader (Miami, FL)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This brings hope and recognition to our community's history.
  • It could also drive local economic benefits through increased cultural tourism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Tourism Consultant (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see potential for increased heritage tourism with this policy, which could benefit local economies.
  • Crucial to keep a balance between tourism development and respectful preservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

School Principal (Detroit, MI)

Age: 44 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Incorporating this history into education will help affirm students' identities.
  • Hope the policy encourages partnerships with schools for educational programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Graduate Student (Tulsa, OK)

Age: 32 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program will unlock new areas for research and understanding of African-American legacies.
  • There's a worry about equitable access to grants and funding across different sites.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Civil Rights Attorney (Charleston, SC)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Legal protection and funding for preservation are long overdue.
  • Monitoring will be essential to ensure funds are properly used and sites are protected.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $21000000 (Low: $16000000, High: $26000000)

Year 3: $22000000 (Low: $17000000, High: $27000000)

Year 5: $24000000 (Low: $19000000, High: $29000000)

Year 10: $27000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $32000000)

Year 100: $50000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $55000000)

Key Considerations