Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6803

Bill Overview

Title: Alaska Tourism Restoration Extension Act

Description: This bill extends for one year the authority for specified foreign-owned and -flagged cruise ships to transport passengers directly between ports in the states of Washington and Alaska without stopping in Canada. Under current law, these ships cannot transport passengers from one U.S. port to another without stopping in a foreign country. The bill applies to any foreign voyage that begins any date prior to February 28, 2023, on which Canada prohibits a vessel from berthing or docking in Canadian waters of the Pacific Coast due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sponsors: Rep. Young, Don [R-AK-At Large]

Target Audience

Population: People participating in or economically dependent on Alaskan cruise tourism

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Tourism Operator (Juneau, Alaska)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The extension of this policy is crucial for my business.
  • Canadian restrictions have severely impacted us; this gives us a fighting chance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 2
Year 10 5 2
Year 20 5 2

Port Manager (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Removing the Canadian stop requirement stabilizes port activities.
  • This policy ensures workflow and employment rates at the port remain stable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Store Owner (Ketchikan, Alaska)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the policy; more tourists mean more sales.
  • Keeping ships operational between here and Washington is vital.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 4 2
Year 20 4 2

Retired (Anchorage, Alaska)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The more tourists that visit, the better the returns on my investments.
  • I am supportive of any policy that supports local economic growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Travel Agent (Vancouver, Canada)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This move by the U.S. could disrupt various travel plans we arrange.
  • Canadian ports losing revenue due to bypassing isn’t ideal for Canada.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cruise Line Employee (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a relief to have more customers moving between Seattle and Alaska.
  • I'm hopeful the policy will keep job security stable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Fishing Guide (Sitka, Alaska)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Expedited routes mean more tourists can access my services.
  • Reliance on cruise tourists makes extensions of such policies necessary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 5 2
Year 5 5 2
Year 10 5 2
Year 20 5 2

Tourist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm more likely to take a cruise knowing it can still happen despite restrictions.
  • Policies like these make planning feasible.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Hospitality Manager (Fairbanks, Alaska)

Age: 55 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Extending cruise operations likely means better business for our hotel.
  • Any tourist policy that supports more visitors helps us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Finance Analyst (New York, New York)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could improve short-term tourism stocks.
  • I'm generally cautious but see potential in this move.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations