Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6769

Bill Overview

Title: Pro Codes Act

Description: This bill modifies copyright protections for works that have been adopted by reference into law. Specifically, if a work that is otherwise subject to copyright protection has been adopted or incorporated by reference, in full or in part, into any law or regulation, the original work shall be protected under copyright only if the copyright owner makes the work available for free on a publicly accessible website.

Sponsors: Rep. Deutch, Theodore E. [D-FL-22]

Target Audience

Population: People needing access to legally-referenced copyrighted works

Estimated Size: 3000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Judge (New York City, NY)

Age: 59 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy will streamline our procedures, allowing access to the codes directly referenced in our court cases.
  • My job will be improved by not having to wait for or pay for certain essential works.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Architect (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is excellent—sometimes the barriers to accessing building codes are frustrating and expensive.
  • If these materials are more freely available, project costs could be reduced.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Compliance Officer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this change will significantly impact our department's efficiency in staying updated on regulations.
  • We rely heavily on our ability to understand the regulations that directly affect our industry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 5

Oil and Gas Regulation Specialist (Houston, TX)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Adopting this act will reduce overhead in accessing critical regulatory codes.
  • More crucially, it should improve public transparency regarding regulations impacting environmental safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 6 6

Law Student (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Accessing these works for free would support my study and research substantially.
  • The cost to access some legal references limits thorough academic research.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 5

Small Business Owner (Denver, CO)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything that reduces red tape and costs for accessing necessary business information is beneficial to us.
  • This could result in significant savings on time and money.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Software Developer (Boston, MA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see the Pro Codes Act as a boost to innovation in legal tech.
  • It expands our ability to create solutions that pull directly from these regulatory data sources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Retired Teacher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I don't directly deal with regulations often, it's empowering knowing there's widespread access should I need it for teaching purposes.
  • This type of initiative is crucial for fostering informed citizenry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Research Assistant (Portland, OR)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy would enhance resource availability for our research projects.
  • It should improve the quality of academic research outputs significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Corporate Lawyer (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Free access to referenced codes is a long-overdue development.
  • It should help lower our operational costs and speed up the procurement of necessary documents.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $20000000)

Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $15000000)

Year 5: $12000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $16000000)

Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $14000000)

Year 100: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $13000000)

Key Considerations