Bill Overview
Title: Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2022
Description: This bill provides for the award of a Congressional Gold Medal posthumously to Constance Baker Motley in recognition of her contributions and service to the United States in advancing civil rights as an attorney, elected official, and judge.
Sponsors: Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals inspired or affected by the legacy of Constance Baker Motley
Estimated Size: 0
- The Congressional Tribute to Constance Baker Motley Act of 2022 primarily serves as an honorary recognition, awarding a posthumous Congressional Gold Medal to an individual.
- While this posthumous award does not directly impact a population's wellbeing, it acknowledges and honors the historical contributions of Constance Baker Motley to the civil rights movement.
- Recognitions like these can influence societal values, inspire individuals, and emphasize the importance of civil rights history and its contributors.
- Therefore, the symbolic impact or indirect influence extends to those interested or involved in civil rights, legal professions, and minority communities.
Reasoning
- The policy itself is an honorary recognition posthumously awarded to Constance Baker Motley and does not directly affect material well-being.
- The indirect impact is focused on cultural and societal values, particularly affecting individuals in the legal and civil rights fields who might find inspiration in Motley's legacy.
- The simulation aims to reflect a broad range of perspectives but must account for the limited direct impact on well-being due to the symbolic nature of this act.
Simulated Interviews
Civil Rights Attorney (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Motley's recognition is well-deserved and highlights the continuous fight for civil rights.
- It inspires me to continue my efforts in the legal arena.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
History Professor (Montgomery, AL)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The award brings attention to important historical figures who often go unrecognized, enhancing educational material and engagement.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Judge (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Motley's achievements remind me of the hurdles still faced by women and minorities in law.
- Her story is a guiding light for perseverance.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired Civil Rights Activist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 70 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's good to see leaders like Constance being recognized by their country posthumously.
- Progress is sometimes slow, but recognitions are crucial for historical memory.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Law Student (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Reading about Motley's award in law school motivates me to pursue my goals in public service.
- Representation matters at all levels of achievement.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Corporate Lawyer (Houston, TX)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While I support the recognition, my focus is more on my immediate career concerns.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 32 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These acts recognize crucial contributions and uplift the work of current policymakers and activists.
- It's a moral boost seeing someone like Motley acknowledged.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Community Organizer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 52 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Such recognitions highlight changing societal values and encourage grassroots work.
- Motley's acknowledgement is part of a larger shift.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Retired Judge (Oxford, MS)
Age: 65 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Honoring Motley is a fitting recognition of her groundbreaking work in law and civil rights.
- Such honors remind us of the progress made and the work ahead.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Paralegal (Boston, MA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Acts like this highlight the impact one person can have and reinforces my commitment to civil rights law.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $100000 (Low: $70000, High: $150000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The Congressional Gold Medal has historical and cultural significance, enhancing the recognition of notable contributions to society.
- While it bears a cost, the symbolic value and importance to cultural heritage is considerable and intangible.
- The medal serves as a form of national honor and recognition that can inspire and influence societal values.