Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6765

Bill Overview

Title: FUELS Act

Description: This bill increases thresholds for requiring a farm to have a plan to address oil spills. Currently, regulations require a farm to have an oil spill control and prevention plan that is certified by a professional engineer if the farm's aboveground oil storage capacity is above a certain threshold or if the farm has a reportable oil discharge history. A farm with lower aboveground storage capacity and no reportable history is either allowed to self-certify its plan or not required to have a plan at all, depending on the farm's storage capacity.     Under the bill, the Environmental Protection Agency must require a farm to have a professionally certified plan if the farm has an aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity of 40,000 gallons or more, whereas the current threshold is 20,000 gallons. The bill also raises the aggregate capacity thresholds at which a farm with no reportable oil discharge history may self-certify its plan or is not required to have a plan. The bill also limits when a farm's aboveground oil storage containers on separate parcels shall count toward the farm's oil storage capacity for the purposes of these thresholds.

Sponsors: Rep. Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [R-AR-1]

Target Audience

Population: Farmers with aboveground oil storage

Estimated Size: 250000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Corn Farmer (Iowa)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy helps us keep our compliance costs down, allowing more investment into our crops and farm upgrades.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Dairy Farmer (California)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our farm won't see much change; we've been compliant at higher thresholds and will continue to do so.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Rancher (Texas)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Relief from strict plans helps small operators like me focus more on ranching rather than deal with paperwork.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Grain Farmer (Nebraska)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More flexibility in these regulations means a lot, even if we don't exceed current thresholds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Tobacco Farmer (Kentucky)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our operations are already efficient, so this bill doesn't change much for us directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Organic Vegetable Farmer (New York)

Age: 51 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We support policies that empower small farmers without unnecessary regulation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Rice Farmer (Mississippi)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This legislation won't help us much since we must maintain comprehensive spill plans anyway.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Tree Farmer (Oregon)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • All my storage management is on point, this wouldn't really affect us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Citrus Farmer (Florida)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Raised storage thresholds offer a chance to direct funds to more critical farm investments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Soybean Farmer (Wisconsin)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any measure that reduces regulatory compliance hardships is appreciated by those like us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $4500000 (Low: $3500000, High: $5500000)

Year 5: $4500000 (Low: $3500000, High: $5500000)

Year 10: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $5000000)

Year 100: $400000 (Low: $350000, High: $450000)

Key Considerations