Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6731

Bill Overview

Title: To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 to extend the authorization of financial assistance with respect to the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area.

Description: This bill extends the authority of the Department of the Interior to provide assistance for the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area in New York until May 8, 2038.

Sponsors: Rep. Higgins, Brian [D-NY-26]

Target Audience

Population: People visiting or residing near the Niagara Falls National Heritage Area

Estimated Size: 5000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

small business owner (Buffalo, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy provides much-needed financial support to maintain the beauty and attraction of Niagara Falls.
  • It could help businesses like mine by ensuring more tourists visit the area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

historian (Rochester, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy aids in preserving historically significant sites which are crucial for educational and cultural purposes.
  • I support any initiative focused on heritage conservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

college student (New York, NY)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've only been to Niagara Falls once, but it's a beautiful site worth preserving.
  • Although not directly impactful to me, such policies are vital for environmental conservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

retired (Newark, NJ)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I look forward to my yearly visit to the falls.
  • Financial support helps maintain the site, ensuring a pleasant experience for visitors like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

travel blogger (Toronto, Canada)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I'm Canadian, the preservation of Niagara Falls is globally significant.
  • Policies like these ensure that tourism remains high without environmental degradation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

local government official (Albany, NY)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy extension is crucial for maintaining the economic growth and tourism inflow to the region.
  • It will help us continue development projects without interruption.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

school teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies supporting natural and historical sites enrich educational experiences.
  • It may not directly impact me, but it enhances the learning resources available for field trips.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

retired engineer (Boston, MA)

Age: 66 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm pleased they are extending support for such a magnificent place.
  • Our family travels there often, and I want my grandchildren to see it well-preserved.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

restaurant owner (Buffalo, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Support for the heritage area boosts tourism, directly benefiting my business.
  • Our local economy relies heavily on these policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 10 5
Year 20 9 5

policy analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's encouraging to see long-term support for iconic natural sites, which require continuous investment for preservation.
  • I analyze these policies for their impact, observing both direct and indirect effects on tourism and local improvement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 3: $2100000 (Low: $1600000, High: $2600000)

Year 5: $2200000 (Low: $1700000, High: $2700000)

Year 10: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Key Considerations