Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6721

Bill Overview

Title: Corona Municipal Airport Lease Extension Act

Description: This bill requires the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to treat the City of Corona, California's lease to operate the Corona Municipal Airport as a valid water resource development project lease for the purpose of renewal. The Corona Municipal Airport is located within the Prado Flood Control Basin Project Area. The City of Corona operates the airport and leases the land from the USACE.

Sponsors: Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-42]

Target Audience

Population: Residents of Corona, California and affected stakeholders

Estimated Size: 160000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Airport Operations Manager (Corona, California)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe extending the lease is crucial for job security.
  • The airport supports many local businesses, and if it closes, my job could be at risk.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Small Business Owner (Corona, California)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The airport lease extension means stable business for me.
  • If the airport closed or was unstable, it would reduce my clientele significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Logistics Coordinator (Riverside, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is beneficial, as it ensures logistics efficiency remains uncompromised.
  • Any disruption at Corona Airport would complicate supply chains.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Environmental Activist (San Bernardino, California)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The airport lease could have mixed environmental impacts.
  • I hope the policy considers ecological protection as well as development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Commercial Pilot (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stable airport operations mean fewer disruptions in my flight schedules.
  • The policy's implementation would likely smooth out operational hiccups.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired (Corona, California)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry that the lease extension means ongoing noise pollution for the community.
  • The airport's presence has always been a double-edged sword.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 6
Year 3 4 6
Year 5 3 6
Year 10 3 7
Year 20 3 7

Civil Engineer at USACE (Corona, California)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a standard procedure and a necessary update to infrastructure management.
  • Ensures the city can plan long-term projects without interruptions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

School Teacher (Corona, California)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important for community educational programs to connect with local industries, like the airport.
  • The airport provides learning opportunities for students interested in aviation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

College Student (Corona, California)

Age: 21 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The lease renewal is exciting as it presents more learning and job prospects for students like me.
  • It shows potential for stable business growth and internship opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Aviation Enthusiast and Hobbyist Pilot (San Diego, California)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The lease ensures continued availability of hangar spaces and facilities for pilots.
  • It's reassuring because uncertainty over the lease was a concern.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 2: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 3: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 5: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 10: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 100: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Key Considerations